Entradas

From Load-Bearer to Space-Maker: Considering the Contemporary Column

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

Columns, one of the most fundamental structural elements in architecture, have long transcended their functional purpose to become powerful aesthetic and spatial tools. In contemporary architecture, particularly within open-plan designs, the use of columns is not limited to supporting the weight of a structure. Instead, architects have used columns to frame spaces, guide movement, create a sense of rhythm and bridge the gap between structure and art.

Through the manipulation of their size, placement and materiality, columns are employed to define spatial experiences while preserving the openness and fluidity inherent in open-plan designs. In this article I explore how different architects utilize columns to create open-plan elegance while highlighting the architectural depth and intention behind some of their designs.


The Evolution of Columns in Architecture

Columns have been a fundamental part of architectural history, with origins dating back to ancient civilizations like Egypt, Greece and Rome. Initially, columns served purely as load-bearing elements, essential for supporting the massive stone roofs of temples, palaces and public buildings. The early use of columns, particularly in classical architecture, was driven by necessity, with their design focused on stability and proportion. From the slender, fluted Doric columns of Greek temples to the ornate Corinthian pillars that adorned Roman basilicas, columns were both functional and symbolic, representing power, order and permanence.

Today, the role of columns has evolved dramatically. In modern architecture, particularly within open-plan and minimalist designs, columns are no longer confined to their structural function. Instead, they have transformed into tools of spatial expression, playing an active role in shaping environments, guiding movement, and even blurring the boundaries between art and architecture. Their presence creates rhythm and flow within a space, while their materiality, form and placement contribute to the spatial identity of a design. In this way, columns continue to be transformative, moving from simple supports to sophisticated elements that enhance the architectural experience.


SANAA’s Nuanced Treatment of Columns

Grace Farms, New Canaan, CT, United States by SANAA

Grace Farms by SANAA, New Canaan, Connecticut

It’s safe to say that anyone in the world of architecture is familiar with SANAA, the renowned Japanese architectural firm led by Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa. Their work is a prime example of how the role of columns in architecture can be reimagined, transforming them into far more than structural supports. In their work, columns take on a poetic dimension, becoming subtle yet powerful tools that shape the spatial experience. By embracing transparency and minimalism, SANAA integrates columns in ways that seem to dissolve the boundary between interior and exterior, creating spaces that feel fluid, open, and light. Their approach to columns often emphasizes delicacy and elegance, with slender, almost invisible supports that allow the architecture to feel as if it is floating, rather than being firmly anchored to the ground.

This nuanced treatment of columns fundamentally alters the way people interact with their buildings. Rather than perceiving columns as obstacles or purely functional elements, occupants engage with them as part of the architectural language. The columns frame views, define pathways and contribute to the ethereal quality of their building’s designs. In projects like the Louvre-Lens Museum, the Glass Pavilion at the Toledo Museum of Art or even Grace Farms, the columns are strategically placed to guide movement through the space, creating an experience that is both dynamic and serene. This delicate balance between transparency and support challenges conventional perceptions of structure, making the columns integral to how people perceive and use SANAA’s buildings — both as a part of the architectural narrative and as an active influence on how the space feels and functions.


The Psychology of Columns

Harvard Art Museums, Cambridge, MA, United States by Renzo Piano Building Workshop

Harvard Art Museums by Renzo Piano Building Workshop, Cambridge, Massachusetts 

Columns play a subtle yet powerful role in shaping the psychology of how people perceive and experience a space. Their design, placement and materiality can influence emotional responses and perceptions in significant ways. Repeated columns create a sense of rhythm and order, fostering stability and calm, while also framing views and guiding the eye toward specific focal points, enhancing engagement with the environment. The scale of a column also affects how people perceive a space — grand, imposing columns evoke awe and a sense of grandeur, whereas slender columns make a space feel light and approachable.

Additionally, columns guide movement through a building, subtly directing how people navigate, explore or pause within the space. Their arrangement also impacts the sense of openness or enclosure; closely spaced columns can create intimacy and privacy, while widely spaced columns maintain openness while structuring the flow. The materiality of columns — whether stone, glass or metal — further affects the psychological experience, influencing perceptions of strength, transparency or modernity. Altogether, columns shape both how we interact with a space and our emotional connection to it, making them essential to the psychology of architectural design.


Jun’ya Ishigami’s Organic Chaos

Where SANAA employs columns to reinforce minimalism and transparency, Jun’ya Ishigami takes an entirely different approach in his design for the Kanagawa Institute of Technology (KAIT) Workshop. Here, columns become the primary spatial organizers, transforming the open-plan layout into an environment that feels organic, almost chaotic, yet deeply intentional. Ishigami’s use of columns in this project represents a radical departure from the conventional grid-based column arrangement; instead, the columns are placed randomly, with varying heights and thicknesses, creating a forest-like atmosphere.

The irregular placement of columns in the KAIT Workshop serves a dual purpose: it challenges the traditional notions of order and structure in architecture while simultaneously offering flexibility and adaptability in the use of space. The columns, rather than being simple supports, are designed to evoke natural elements, like trees in a forest, blurring the boundaries between the built environment and nature. This randomness creates a non-hierarchical space where no single area is privileged over another, allowing for fluid interaction between the users and the architecture.

Ishigami’s intention with this design is to foster creativity and interaction within an open, undefined space. The columns do not dictate specific functions for different areas; instead, they encourage users to interpret the space in their own way. In this sense, the columns become more than structural supports; they act as spatial generators, shaping the way people move through and inhabit the space. In contrast, Jun’ya Ishigami’s approach to columns is more experimental, often challenging conventional perceptions of structure and space. His columns tend to be whimsical, irregular, and sometimes even exaggerated in their presence. Rather than disappearing into the background, Ishigami’s columns assert themselves, creating surreal, dreamlike environments.

Unlike SANAA’s fluid transparency, Ishigami’s columns actively shape and distort space, often creating a sense of wonder and unpredictability. Both architects push the boundaries of column use, but in distinctly different ways — SANAA toward invisibility and elegance, Ishigami toward experimental and immersive spatial play.


Renzo Piano: Functional Rhythm in Museum Design

Kimbell Art Museum Expansion, Fort Worth, TX, United States by Renzo Piano Building Workshop

Another architect who masterfully employs columns to shape space is Renzo Piano, particularly in his extension of the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, Texas. In this project, Piano integrates a series of steel columns into the design, creating a subtle but powerful rhythm that defines the spatial experience. He uses columns in a refined and deliberate way to shape the space, alter the experience, and influence the interaction between people and architecture. Unlike others who use columns as bold visual statements, Piano’s use of columns is understated, allowing the architecture to remain the backdrop to the art it houses.

The steel columns in the Kimbell Art Museum extension are placed along the glass façade, framing views of the landscape while maintaining the openness of the gallery spaces. The columns are slim and carefully positioned to ensure that they do not interrupt the flow of space, while still providing the necessary structural support for the expansive glass walls. Here, Piano’s use of columns is about creating a balance between transparency and enclosure, allowing natural light to flood the interior while maintaining a sense of openness and connectivity with the surrounding environment. The columns act as framing devices, both literally and metaphorically, guiding the viewer’s gaze and shaping the way the space is experienced.

The columns play an integral role in the blurring of boundaries between structure and space. They influence how visitors perceive the architecture—not just as a series of rooms, but as a cohesive experience where the structure itself becomes part of the artistic narrative. This rhythm shapes the visitor’s experience, influencing the pace at which they move through the space and the way they engage with both the art and the architecture.


Columns are far more than mere structural supports; they are pivotal elements that shape the way we perceive, experience and interact with architecture. The way architects think about and utilize columns can dramatically transform spatial design, influencing everything from the flow of movement to the emotional and psychological impact of a space. Whether they create rhythm, frame views, guide circulation or define openness, columns play a crucial role in the relationship between structure and experience.

As architecture evolves, the role of columns continues to expand, allowing them to transcend their functional origins and become tools for artistic expression, spatial transformation, and human engagement. How we think about and use columns is essential not only to the integrity of buildings but also to the richness of the environments we inhabit. They shape our experience of space in ways that are both subtle and profound, making them one of the most fundamental elements in the language of architecture.

The 13th A+Awards invites firms to submit a range of timely new categories, emphasizing architecture that balances local innovation with global vision. Your visionary projects deserve the spotlight, so start your submission today!

The post From Load-Bearer to Space-Maker: Considering the Contemporary Column appeared first on Journal.

Architecture 101: 5 Foundational 20th Century Architectural Texts

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

When we think of architectural contributions, we tend to envision breathtaking buildings, stunning drawings, conscious urban regeneration practices and even carefully crafted furniture. Still, many architects, especially during the early 20th and 21st centuries, have greatly influenced the architectural discipline not through their physical work but rather through their writings. To challenge the status quo, promote interdisciplinary research and reflect upon the deeper meaning behind architectural discourse, architectural texts have been consistently produced in the forms of manifestos, essays, lectures, books and critiques.

It is not by chance that some of the greatest architects-writers have emerged in the last two centuries, during which architecture drifted away from ornamentation and flamboyancy and followed a rather philosophical-symbolic trajectory. Modernism, Deconstructivism, Structuralism, the Bauhaus school and the post-modernism movement — albeit very different — follow the principle of making architecture that speaks beyond the surface, often touching upon subjects of philosophy, culture, diversity and human existence.


Frank Lloyd Wright, ‘In the Cause of Architecture’

Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the most influential writers for American architecture. In a series of essays titled ‘In the Cause of Architecture’ (1908-1952), he articulates his belief on organic architecture, presenting nature as a guide for the architect to create buildings that ‘grow as a plant grows in its own site.’ He promotes a practice that is not enslaved to ‘orders’ or ‘styles’ but rather understands the organic nature of human buildings, where integrity becomes the primary basis for all forms and materials.


Le Corbusier, ‘Towards a New Architecture’

Le Corbusier’s writings were instrumental at advancing the modernist movement. He published nearly forty books, with his writings starting as early as 1910. One of his most famous and highly controversial books, ‘Towards a New Architecture,’ was published in 1927. The now-classic text features a series of essays that advocate for a discipline that dismisses any architecture that relies on style and instead promotes a new mode of interaction between humans and buildings based on function and pure form. Architectural historian Reyner Banham wrote: “Its influence was beyond that of any other architectural work published in this [20th] century…”


Robert Venturi, ‘Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture’

Written in 1966 and translated into sixteen languages, ‘Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture’ was considered a source text for the postmodernism movement. Venturi’s ‘gentle manifesto for a non-straightforward architecture’ rebels against the austere principles of modernism and argues for an architecture that is meaningful only in the context of its surroundings. He looks at buildings not as sculptures and forms but rather as containers of everyday life that establish dynamic, complex relationships with their inhabitants. Venturi’s writings became a rallying cry against the simplicity of Modernism. He argued for complexity, contradiction, and ornamentation, advocating a “both-and” approach rather than the “either-or” mentality of Modernist architecture.


Aldo Rossi, ‘The Architecture of the City’

Rossi’s writings are rooted in a deep analysis of the urban fabric and collective memory. He was a central figure in the postmodern movement, and his theoretical work challenged the functionalist approach of Modernism, attempting to rediscover the traditional European city. His book ‘The Architecture of the City’ published in 1966, is a critique towards the lack of understanding of cities in contemporary practice. He approaches architecture as a vessel of memory, activated through monuments which in turn, give structure to the city. Rossi’s book was used as a significant reference for the reconstruction of Berlin after the fall of the wall, strongly advocating that history as well as meaning should be expressed through urban form.


Rem Koolhaas, ‘Delirious New York’

Delirious New York serves as a retroactive manifesto for Manhattan between 1850 and 1960 that reinterprets the dynamic relationship between architecture and culture. In the late 19th century, population, information and technology led to the testing of a new metropolitan lifestyle in the famous island. Koolhaas examines New York’s history, the Manhattan grid, Coney Island as well as the development of the skyscraper using witty, illustrated photographs, water color imagery, postcards and maps he collected throughout his time living in the city. Even though the text focuses on Manhattan, Delirious New York explores more broadly the role of chaos and contradiction in shaping cities, challenging conventional approaches to scale, globalization and urbanism.


Building, Thinking, Writing…

Architectural writing acts as a powerful medium, able to convey ideology, emotion and theory that inevitably shapes the way we perceive architecture. Still, the written word in architecture has, unfortunately, a very reserved reach. Mostly directed towards architects, theoreticians and academics, architectural texts have not established an immediacy with the wider public. For the non-architects, Le Corbusier is appreciated because of his modernist projects; Rem Koolhaas’s CMG Headquarter is recognized far more than his texts and when Frank Lloyd Write’s name is mentioned, the Falling Water is the work that immediately comes to mind.

This disconnect between architectural writing and the general public highlights a significant challenge: while buildings themselves are accessible and open to interpretation, the complex ideas and philosophies behind them often remain obscure, locked within academic discourse. To bridge this gap, it is crucial for architects to find ways to communicate their ideas in more relatable terms, allowing the broader audience to appreciate not only the aesthetics or utility of a structure, but also the deeper cultural, social, and philosophical meanings that shape its creation.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

Featured Image: Massimo Alberici, Cimitero San Cataldo crop, CC BY-SA 3.0

The post Architecture 101: 5 Foundational 20th Century Architectural Texts appeared first on Journal.

Local Wisdom, Global Impact: 3 Ways Architects Are Designing Contextually Relevant Spaces

Architizer's 13th A+Awards features a suite of sustainability-focused categories that recognizing designers that are building a green industry — and a better future. Start your entry to receive global recognition for your work!

Globalization has changed nearly every aspect of our lives — how we communicate, work and spend our days. Architecture, of course, is no exception.

In many cities today, you can see the results of this global approach — so called iconic buildings that stand out but don’t always (or more like…never) blend with their surroundings. While these structures succeed in making a statement, they end up feeling disconnected from the local identity, leading to a sense of sameness from one city to the next. This is one of the downsides of globalization: losing the unique character that gives each place its identity.

Luckily, there’s a shift happening. More architects are turning back to the local — whether through materials, traditions or adapting to the natural environment — to create buildings that aren’t just innovative in a technical sense, but also deeply connected to their specific location. This return to contextual architecture was a recurring theme at Architizer’s Future Fest this year, where architects from all over the globe spoke about their efforts to balance global design with local relevance.

Inspired by these incredible talks, this article will explore three case studies, each in a different context, demonstrating how architecture can be both globally aware and locally rooted.


Salagnac Arquitectos: Designing with Nature and Local Knowledge

Salagnac Arquitectos has a clear mission: to bring people closer to nature and improve their well-being through architecture.

Based in Costa Rica, a country known for its “blue zone” status — where people live longer, healthier lives — their approach reflects a deep understanding of how the natural environment can improve everyday life. As Principal Evangelina Quesada put it, “The secrets of health and happiness are here [in Costa Rica] and we’re trying to use architecture to get us closer to these life experiences.”

Loma Sagrada House by Salagnac Arquitectos, Nosara, Costa Rica | Jury Winner, Private House (XL > 6000 sq ft), 12th Annual A+Awards

A prime example of this philosophy in action is the Loma Sagrada House. Built on land once degraded by livestock, the project transformed the site into a regenerative space. Rather than disrupt the landscape, Salagnac minimized earth movement, preserved the natural soil structure and used plantation-grown wood. The house itself is designed to take advantage of the microclimate, with natural ventilation and solar energy systems keeping things sustainable.The result? A home that not only reduces environmental impact but also makes the most of its natural surroundings, proving that architecture can be regenerative, not just sustainable.

Casa de las Estrellas, a preschool, follows the same logic. The design uses organic forms and roundwood structures to create a space that feels connected to the earth. The open-air classrooms encourage students to engage with their environment, reflecting the school’s Waldorf-inspired approach to education.

During their Future Fest talk, Spendlingwimmer and Quesada explained the numerous benefits of this setup, emphasizing how learning in such a natural environment helps children develop a stronger connection with the world around them.

By being surrounded by nature, children are more attuned to their sensory experiences, leading to improved cognitive development, emotional well-being and creativity. The architecture is designed not only to encourage learning but also to enhance well-being from an early age, combining education with the benefits of natural exploration.

Takeaway: While Salagnac’s designs are rooted in Costa Rica’s unique environment, the broader principles behind their work—such as the integration of movement, natural light and connection with nature—can be applied in other parts of the world. Even if architects can’t replicate Costa Rica’s tropical setting, they can still create spaces that promote well-being, engage with the local climate and foster a deeper relationship with the natural environment. In a globalized world, these ideas are increasingly relevant as architects everywhere look for ways to design with health, sustainability and human experience in mind.

Register to Access Recording


Mecanoo: Global Expertise with Local Collaboration

Rodrigo Louro, Associate Architect at Mecanoo, explains the firm’s philosophy as staying open-minded and allowing each project to be shaped by its specific context. “Mecanoo is not known for a formal language. We don’t have a certain signature design. By understanding the context, we are able to create very different buildings and projects around the globe,” he shared. This adaptability — combined with collaboration with local architects — keeps their work globally relevant yet rooted in local identity. To illustrate this approach, Louro spoke about several of their projects in Taiwan, highlighting how each was designed in response to its environment and community.

National Kaohsiung Centre for the Arts (Wei-Wu-Ying) by Mecanoo, Kaohsiung, Taiwan | Project of the Year, 2019; Jury & Popular Choice Winner, Hall/Theater, 7th Annual A+Awards

On one hand, their work on the Kaohsiung Center for the Arts shows how design can emerge directly from the natural environment. Rather than dictating a rigid structure, Mecanoo took inspiration from the surrounding banyan trees—famous for their wide canopies that create informal public gathering spaces. By mimicking this form, they created sheltered public areas that seamlessly merge with the park. The takeaway? Good design often comes from listening to the landscape and respecting the existing patterns of a place.

Kaohsiung Train Station by Mecanoo, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

On the other hand, with Kaohsiung Station, Mecanoo adopted a more multi-functional approach. Here, the focus wasn’t just on merging into the landscape but on how the station could serve the community in a more functional sense. The sprawling canopy shelters not only the transport elements but also cycling paths, plazas and spaces for community events. It’s a reminder that buildings can do more than serve their primary function—they can shape public life in ways that encourage interaction and bring people together.

Tainan Public Library by Mecanoo, Tainan City, Taiwan | Popular Choice Winner, Libraries, 12th Annual A+Awards

Collaboration is another critical theme in Mecanoo’s work, as exemplified by the Tainan Public Library. Working with local firm MAYU, they incorporated elements of traditional Tainan architecture into the design, like vertical slats that reference the local building vernacular. This partnership allowed the project to integrate cultural and environmental sensitivities that might otherwise be missed. By collaborating with local architects, they enriched the project’s connection to its context, showing how the right partnerships can create more meaningful, grounded architecture.

Takeaway: Mecanoo’s work in Taiwan highlights three key lessons for architects: respond to the local environment in your design, think about how buildings can serve multiple roles for the community and collaborate with local partners to truly embed architecture in its cultural and environmental context. Even if you’re not working in a foreign location, collaboration can still be about engaging with stakeholders, the people who will actually use the space, to ensure the design meets their needs and reflects the unique characteristics of the community.

Register to Access Recording


Alison Brooks Architects: Merging Historical Influence with Modern Design

During her Future Fest talk, Alison Brooks shared how her early experiences shaped her unique approach to combining historical forms with modern architecture. Growing up in Southern Ontario, she was inspired by both the character of historic neo-Romanesque buildings and the optimistic futurism of 1960s modernism.

“I think in a way I’ve always had this idea that there must be some way of synthesizing the historic beauty and craft of architecture with the optimistic futurism of modernism,” Brooks explained. This philosophy is at the heart of her work—balancing tradition with forward-thinking design.

One example of Alison Brooks’ approach is the Cohen Quad at Oxford, where she reimagined the traditional collegiate quadrangle. Instead of the standard square layout, the building features an S-shaped design that weaves between two courtyards, creating a dynamic flow between internal and external spaces. This reconfiguration challenges the familiar archetype, with cloisters, staircases, and garden walks connecting the spaces in a narrative route. At the heart of this project are glulam arches, referencing the historic vaulted forms of Oxford’s older buildings. But rather than using stone, Brooks opts for sustainable timber, adding a warm, modern touch that connects the building to its historical context while also aligning with her focus on sustainability and long-lasting craftsmanship.

Cadence King’s Cross, London by Alison Brooks Architects

Cadence King’s Cross, London by Alison Brooks Architects

Brooks’ use of arched forms also appears in her residential project, Cadence in King’s Cross, London. This mixed-use building integrates arches to create a distinctive identity, with a colonnaded base that brings a sense of civic grandeur while softening the overall scale. Inspired by the area’s industrial past, the building connects to its surroundings through meaningful references. As she mentioned in her Future Fest talk, these design choices help create a sense of continuity and place even in large urban developments.

Takeaway: Alison Brooks Architecture’s work demonstrates how historical forms and familiar archetypes, like arches, can be reimagined for today’s world. Whether through sustainable materials in Oxford or nods to industrial heritage in London, her approach bridges past and present. This combination of historical references and modern techniques offers a way to design spaces that feel grounded, relevant and forward-thinking all at once.

Register to Access Recording


From Local Roots to Global Reach

As these examples from Salagnac Arquitectos, Mecanoo and Alison Brooks show, the future of architecture doesn’t have to be about choosing between the global and the local—it’s about finding a balance. By integrating nature, culture and history into their designs, these architects are creating buildings that are not only innovative but also deeply connected to their specific contexts.

Architizer's 13th A+Awards features a suite of sustainability-focused categories that recognizing designers that are building a green industry — and a better future. Start your entry to receive global recognition for your work!

The post Local Wisdom, Global Impact: 3 Ways Architects Are Designing Contextually Relevant Spaces appeared first on Journal.

Deepfake Buildings: Reconstructing the Past or Paving the Way for the Future?

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The advancement of digital technology is transforming almost every creative industry, from film and media to fine arts and, now, architecture. Just as ‘deep fakes’ in media have been used to recreate people’s likenesses and host virtual events, architecture is undergoing its own digital reinvention. The evolution of AI, machine learning and 3D modeling has many benefits for architecture, and among them, one of the most interesting and controversial is the possibility of resurrecting lost buildings. As cultural heritage is increasingly threatened by war, natural disasters and urban decay, these emerging technologies are being explored as ways to protect our history.

The term ‘deepfake buildings’ is fitting for this phenomenon, where modern technology yields the recreation of architectural icons. However, while traditional deepfakes blur reality and fiction, architectural reconstructions — digital or otherwise — have raised debates around authenticity, historical fidelity and the ethics of replicating structures that have been lost. The critical question is: Should we reconstruct lost icons, and if so, how should we do it?

Wanting to reconstruct lost architecture isn’t new. Throughout history, many societies have rebuilt structures that were destroyed by war or natural disasters, often driven by a sense of historical responsibility. Dresden’s Frauenkirche in Germany, for example, was destroyed in 1945 during World War II. After much debate, the stunning Baroque building was rebuilt over ten years, from 1994 until 2005, using the original plans from builder Georg Bähr. The restored church became a symbol of reconciliation. Warsaw’s Old Town was also rebuilt after its destruction during the war. Using photographs and records, the historic site was restored to its former self and today has UNESCO World Heritage status. However, these efforts raise questions: Can a rebuilt structure genuinely replace the original, or is it merely an effigy of memory?

Today, the tools for reconstruction have evolved dramatically. Photogrammetry, for instance, can accurately create 3D models of lost structures by using archival photographs. This method has been instrumental in reconstructing the ancient site of Palmyra in Syria, where 3D models were developed using images captured before its destruction. This technology can be used to create a detailed digital visualization of the site with a level of precision that would previously have been all but impossible.

BIM, too, has changed the landscape of architectural restoration. By embedding 3D models with historical data, BIM helps architects to reconstruct buildings with structural accuracy while also considering modern requirements like safety regulations and technology integration. The restoration of the fire-damaged Notre Dame in Paris is an excellent example of how BIM has been used to combine historical accuracy with contemporary building standards, ensuring the integrity of both the structure and its legacy.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are also playing an increasingly prominent role in filling the gaps in historical data. The RePAIR Project (Reconstructing the Past: Artificial Intelligence and Robotics meet Cultural Heritage) has used AI and robotics to reconstruct ancient artifacts in the city of Pompeii. Two 2,000-year-old frescoes made up of tens of thousands of fragmented pieces were left untouched for years, having established that they were too complex for humans to reassemble. Thanks to recent advancements in 2021, RePAIR’s AI analysis and 3D-scanned images of each of the shards have accurately predicted how they fit together, providing enough information for robotic arms to put them back together.

While in the digital realm, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are also offering new ways for both architects and the public to engage with reconstructions. While VR enables architects to visualize a project before physical work begins, allowing them to explore design possibilities in a simulated space, AR brings historical sites to life by overlaying digital models onto real-world environments. In historic sites all over the world, AR is being used to give visitors a glimpse of the ancient structures that once stood, blending past and present in an immersive way.

A digital imagination of a street in Pompeii, generated by Architizer via Midjourney.

However, while these technologies bring precision and flexibility, they also invite deeper philosophical concerns. The ability to digitally recreate the past raises the question of what can be lost in translation. A digital model, no matter how accurate, will never fully capture the material reality of a building — the way it interacts with light, how its surfaces age and wear over time, or the emotional impact of standing within the original space. Digital reconstructions, for all their sophistication, remain simulations.

As a result, digital reconstructions risk reducing architecture to a visual exercise, focusing on aesthetics at the expense of the spatial and sensory qualities that ultimately make great architecture meaningful. While these technologies offer exciting new ways to preserve and interact with architectural heritage, they also risk oversimplifying the complexities of material culture, offering only a flattened version of history that is detached from the physical world.

This tension between visual fidelity and material authenticity is at the heart of the debate surrounding reconstructions. On the one hand, these technologies allow us to reclaim lost cultural heritage in ways that were unimaginable just a few decades ago. On the other hand, they challenge us to reconsider the value of what we are reconstructing — whether it is the physical object itself or merely the idea of the object that is of value. Should we rebuild, or is a digital model enough?

One of the most common concerns about reconstructions, or ‘deep fake buildings,’ lies in the allocation of resources. These projects can be costly, not just in financial terms but in labor, time and expertise. The question that appears is whether these investments can be justified when they might otherwise be spent preserving existing heritage or advancing new architectural projects.

For example, the debate surrounding the reconstruction of Palmyra in Syria raises a great point. While the 3D scanning of the site offers the potential for a highly detailed reconstruction, the effort comes at a significant financial and logistical cost. Critics argue that while reconstructing Palmyra will restore a cultural symbol, the funds might be better used to stabilize remaining ruins or to preserve other vulnerable heritage sites around the world. This creates a tension between honoring the memory of what was lost, promoting the benefits of cultural tourism, and addressing the urgent needs of heritage preservation in a broader, global context.

Similarly, others have argued that reconstruction simply stifles architectural evolution. For a long time, towns and cities have evolved with the scars of their history, and that is what makes them so interesting. By reconstructing lost buildings, we risk preventing this organic development. By focusing on recreating what is lost, we might hinder cities from moving forward. And then there’s the issue of selective memory — choosing which parts of history to recreate. The rebuilding of the Royal Palace of Berlin sits at the forefront of this conversation, sparking controversy for favoring a specific historical narrative and potentially distorting cultural memory for future generations.

On the other hand, digital reconstructions offer a way of preserving and experiencing history without altering the urban fabric. In the virtual world, buildings can exist in a state of continual preservation, accessible to anyone with the technology to explore them. This duality — where architectural heritage can be preserved digitally while the physical environment adapts to the present — could be a solution to maintaining our past without obstructing the future.

Ultimately, while reconstructions present exciting opportunities for exploring technology, encouraging engagement and furthering architectural education, they must be carefully balanced with allowing our urban environments to grow and change as we do. Perhaps the best way forward is to find a balance between the two, where we embrace the digital realm for preservation and memory while using the physical world to foster the next generation of architectural innovation.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

Top image: A digital imagination of a street in Pompeii, generated by Architizer via Midjourney.

The post Deepfake Buildings: Reconstructing the Past or Paving the Way for the Future? appeared first on Journal.

Nature Calls: This Beach Bathroom Renovation Embraces an Organic Approach To Function

Calling all architects, landscape architects and interior designers: Architizer's A+Awards allows firms of all sizes to showcase their practice and vie for the title of “World’s Best Architecture Firm.” Start an A+Firm Award Application today. 

In the west of Beihai City, China, stands a micro-intervention with a big impact — both physically and intellectually.

Located in an area so rich in nature tourism that depends on it, REEF is a commercial renovation with a bold vision and an abundance of aces up its sleeve. Formerly a bathroom and refreshments spot for people using the beach outside, C&C Design Co. Ltd. have upgraded the facilities and expanded the building’s purpose far beyond those bare necessities.

Part bathroom with foot-rinse showers, part cafe, all observation point, the project is designed to make us think about our relationship with the planet, particularly its seas, while celebrating the immediate environment’s jaw-dropping beauty. Overhauling the main building, new toilets and showers are scattered across an artificial reef space. Made from weather-resistant concrete and metal, these hard-wearing materials were chosen because their texture resembles the inconsistencies of unrefined rock, with their color and feel set to evolve as surfaces weather.

The beachside facilities before the intervention by C&C Design Co. Ltd., Beihai City, China 

The renovation, called REEF, by C&C Design Co. Ltd., Beihai City, China 

Landscape is the key inspiration for REEF. Individual bathroom stalls are fitted with electric fog-glass, meaning if none are occupied you can walk into the space and see through the screens and out to the stunning setting beyond. A room that can really make an entrance, skylights and windows add fixed view and light entry points, their uneven distribution mimicking the spread of coral and rock across our seabeds.

At the entrance to this ‘toilet grotto’ a coffee bar stands like the start of another system of sea caverns. In turn, this leads through to the kitchen, storage area, staff lockers and changing room. A manmade environment based on how the natural world develops, back outside steps lead down from the cafe area and onto lush tropical sands via the foot showers. This staggered transition is particularly important as it gradually introduces visitors to the natural world from the building itself, without jarringly demarcating these two elements.

Inside REEF ‘s ‘bathroom ecosystem,’ by C&C Design Co. Ltd., Beihai City, China 

REEF belongs to a rare breed of structures that do not follow the clean and often sharp lines of modern architecture’s uniformity. In fact, it’s almost the complete opposite. Although the floor plans do exist, we’ve seen them, there’s a randomized feel to the way the interior has been rethought here, which asks important questions about why we build what we build, how we build it, and why we build it where we do.

Situated in an unspoilt site of outstanding natural beauty, the idea that we should introduce anything remotely functionalist, in the design sense of the word, seems abhorrent and completely out of place. This isn’t a setting for regimented anything or inflexibility. And, in may ways, neither is the world as a whole. Set against a backdrop of organic life which is just that — alive — routine diameters and militaristic distribution would feel like they had been transported here from another dimension and simply dropped in situ.

Light entry points and facilities layout feel randomized at REEF by C&C Design Co. Ltd., Beihai City, China 

REEF by C&C Design Co. Ltd., Beihai City, China 

Although REEF’s exterior structure, which has remained largely unchanged since its past life, delineates it from nature, the topology that has been chosen and the interior design reinforces our connection to the environment. The natural world is governed by systems but, visually at least, often seems defined by chaos and unpredictability. It has been worn and weathered through use and exposure, and slowly modeled to serve a very specific role in a precise location. It’s almost an alternative form of functionalism.

In the firm’s own notes, C&C Design Co Ltd. also point out the relevance of this indeterminate layout to the humans using the facilities. To paraphrase, the space reflects the regularity and frequency of people who will use it, many unlikely to return again. “Today, the construction of scenic service facilities with a unified layout and a pattern is undoubtedly paradoxical, in a sense, it has lost its soul — those diverse, natural, temporal and occasional souls. In a complete natural environment, the atmosphere of the building is inseparable from the spirit of the place. Visitors may not know much about architecture, but they can truly feel that they have a deep intuitive experience and emotional resonance with the nature of this time and place.”

Calling all architects, landscape architects and interior designers: Architizer's A+Awards allows firms of all sizes to showcase their practice and vie for the title of “World’s Best Architecture Firm.” Start an A+Firm Award Application today. 

The post Nature Calls: This Beach Bathroom Renovation Embraces an Organic Approach To Function appeared first on Journal.

Architecture 101: Fredric Jameson and the Art of Reading Buildings

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

Architecture is… of all the arts that closest constitutively to the economic, with which, in the form of commissions and land values, it has a virtually unmediated relationship… Yet this is the point at which we must remind the reader of the obvious, namely that this whole global, yet American, postmodern culture is the internal and superstructural expression of a whole new wave of American military and economic domination throughout the world: in this sense, as throughout class history, the underside of culture is blood, torture, death and horror.

Fredric Jameson, “Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism” (1984) 

I visited Los Angeles for the first time in the winter of 2017. There were plenty of places I wanted to see — The Museum of Jurassic Technology, Griffith Observatory, In-N-Out Burger — but the attraction that most fascinated me was the Westin Bonaventure Hotel in Downtown Los Angeles, a mirrored fortresslike structure designed by John Portman that I had read about in Fredric Jameson’s landmark 1984 essay “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” 

This essay had been assigned to me in college as part of a seminar course that focused on critical theory and architecture. The name of the course escapes me now, but not the professor, a native of Los Angeles who conveyed her ideas about architecture, urban planning and consumerism by means of lively anecdotes about a childhood spent against the backdrop of gated communities, superhighways and wildfires.

Fredric Jameson (1934-2024) was one of the world’s leading academic critics. Working in the traditions of Marxism and critical theory, Jameson wrote on a wide range of topics, from literature to contemporary art, but he had an especially profound influence on the theorization of architecture. Fronteiras do PensamentoFredric Jameson na Sala São Paulo (5768677304)CC BY-SA 2.0

Since then, my sense of Jameson has forever been connected to a certain vision of Los Angeles, a gothic one that I first became familiar with through films. In classics like Chinatown and Mulholland Drive, Los Angeles is portrayed as a cursed place, a city founded on an originary crime or sin. In such films, it is impossible not to read Los Angeles as a metaphor for the American empire and capitalist modernity more broadly. 

Jameson would never have described the symbolism of Los Angeles as crudely as I just did, but his famous analysis of the Bonaventure Hotel suggested that he saw the city this way too — as a place that is defined by its ghosts. Indeed, it was admirers of Jameson, especially Mark Fisher, who developed the now popular tendency of Gothic Marxism, the view that there is something spooky or spectral about capitalism, an economic system that runs on dead labor. (Jon Greenaway’s recent book Capitalism: A Horror Story is a great primer to this way of thinking, as is Fisher’s The Weird and the Eerie.) 

The horror of the Bonaventure Hotel, Jameson wrote in his famous “Postmodernism” essay, is a horror of incomprehensibility. While many are familiar with the idea of postmodern buildings containing stylistic “references” that don’t, together, add up to a coherent system, the crisis of meaning reflected in the Bonaventure has more to do with its confusing floorplan and awkward relationship to the surrounding neighborhood.

This latter point is key, as for Jameson the essential feature of the Bonaventure is its rejection of the outside, its attempt to function as a total world in itself, a mini city where people can shop, congregate, and gaze at one another across looping skywalks and mezzanines. The fact that it is Downtown LA outside, and not Cleveland or Singapore, is more or less incidental, and Jameson reads a lot into the fact that the front entrance to this hotel is hard to find. He speculates that Portman might have viewed the need for doors almost as an embarrassment, “for [the hotel] does not wish to be a part of the city, but rather its equivalent and its replacement or substitute.”

Jameson continues: “But this disjunction from the surrounding city is very different from that of the great monuments of the International Style: there, the act of disjunction was violent, visible, and had a very real symbolic significance — as in Le Corbusier’s great pilotis whose gesture radically separates the new Utopian space of the modern from the degraded and fallen city fabric which it thereby explicitly repudiates (although the gamble of the modern was that this new Utopian space, in the virulence of its Novum, would fan out and transform that eventually by the very power of its new spatial language). The Bonaventura, however, is content to ‘let the fallen city fabric continue to be in its being’ (to parody Heidegger); no further effects, no larger proto-political Utopian transformation, is either expected or desired.” 

So the Bonaventure aspires to be a world unto itself, but not an image of a new world. It is a space for escapism, entertainment, a floating fragment that refuses to be defined by its context, either by attempting to relate to it or by rejecting it outright as the modernists had done. On the top level, there is a rotating bar where one can gaze out at the city from a safe distance. 

Exterior view of the Westin Bonaventure Hotel, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

For Jameson, the Bonaventure represents the crisis of capitalism in the late 20th century, a period he describes as “late capitalism” but which has also been called neo-liberalism or post-Fordism. The idea is that this is an era when the global system is experienced as vast and overwhelming to subjects in developed countries, especially workers, who are less capable than in previous periods of grasping their class position by participating in organizations like labor unions. Politics becomes harder even to theorize as faceless corporations assume more and more power over everyday life. (Think Ned Beatty’s famous speech in Network). In this environment, culture increasingly turns toward solipsism and spectacle.

To me this all sounds very “LA,” dystopian but also glamorous, like looking at your own reflection in the mirrored sunglasses of an indifferent celebrity. Jameson was a midwesterner who spent his academic career at Duke University in North Carolina, but for me he will always be the theorist of Southern California. As a lifelong denizen of the East Coast, I too only know Los Angeles as an outsider. 

To summarize the breadth of Jameson’s work or his influence is beyond the scope of this article and frankly my abilities. My brush with his writing was only a little more than casual. But it would not be an exaggeration to say that it changed me. After reading him, I never again saw architecture as anything other than deeply tied to politics, and especially the political unconscious. Buildings are additions to cities intended to last for many years. Whatever architects think they are doing, they are, in a very real sense, designing proposals for the future. And thinking about buildings this way can yield insights on multiple levels. 

I forget what drink I ordered when I visited the rotating bar at the top of the Bonaventure Hotel. I do remember thinking that this building, which seemed hyper-contemporary to Jameson in 1984, had come to seem, in 2017, comfortably retrofuturist. Perhaps in trying to create a complete and sealed environment, Portman had attempted to exorcise the ghosts of the past, the stain of the surrounding city. But now, unmistakably, there were ghosts here too.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

Cover Image: Detail of the Westin Bonaventure. Photo by Joe Howell, CC 2.0 via Pexel

The post Architecture 101: Fredric Jameson and the Art of Reading Buildings appeared first on Journal.

Outdoor Fitness Architecture: The Rise of Calisthenics Parks

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

As cities continue to evolve into hubs of active living, outdoor fitness architecture is becoming a prominent part of urban design. The rise of calisthenics parks, designed for bodyweight exercises, yoga and group workouts, reflects a growing desire to merge fitness and community engagement in public spaces. These outdoor fitness parks offer more than just a space to exercise — they provide accessible, safe and functional environments that promote health, well-being and social interaction.


An Early Influence

I want to begin my article by emphasizing that public spaces, urban planning and playground design share many similarities with outdoor sports facilities and calisthenics parks. These spaces are all rooted in the same design principles — fostering community engagement, accessibility and encouraging physical activity — while also shaping how people interact with their environment. Additionally, they all share the commonality of being intentionally designed with a purpose: to serve the public and enhance the city or urban landscape in meaningful ways. Each space is carefully crafted to improve functionality, promote community well-being and contribute to the overall urban experience. The concept of outdoor fitness parks has deep historical roots, and one of the key influences on their development can be traced back to Dutch architect Aldo van Eyck.

Aldo van Eyck’s work is remarkable, particularly after World War II, when he designed numerous playgrounds throughout Amsterdam. His aim was to integrate play spaces into the urban fabric, creating environments where children could interact with the city while fostering community engagement. His minimalist designs used geometric forms and site-specific layouts, which emphasized simplicity and accessibility. Van Eyck’s playgrounds were much more than just places to play; they were a way to connect people with their city, making public spaces both functional and inviting.

This legacy of merging urban spaces with functional public areas can be seen in the rise of modern calisthenics parks, which are designed to promote fitness, well-being and community engagement. Just like van Eyck’s playgrounds, these fitness parks incorporate minimalism, geometric shapes and site-specific design to enhance the urban environment and offer accessible fitness opportunities for people of all ages.


The Role of Architecture in Outdoor Fitness Parks

 

1. Accessibility: Ensuring Inclusivity for All

Calisthenics parks can be found in various locations, but they are typically placed in central, highly accessible areas of the city. You often see them in large public parks, integrated into neighborhoods that lack traditional playgrounds or urban activity spaces. They’re also strategically located near open spaces and sports fields, where people are naturally drawn to outdoor activities. These parks are designed to promote community engagement and physical fitness in areas where people are already inclined to be active.

One of the most important aspects of outdoor fitness architecture is accessibility. Calisthenics parks are designed to be used by people of all ages and fitness levels, from beginners to advanced athletes. Architects play a key role in ensuring that these spaces are inclusive, providing equipment and layouts that cater to diverse users. For example, adjustable-height bars, wheelchair-friendly access points, and smooth, level surfaces can make a park welcoming to those with mobility challenges. Moreover, the layout of these parks often encourages flow and ease of movement, ensuring that users can seamlessly transition between exercises. Wide pathways and open spaces between equipment prevent congestion, while ramps and railings make the area accessible to all. This commitment to inclusivity is essential in creating a fitness space that serves the entire community.

2. Safety: Designing for Injury Prevention

Safety is another critical factor in outdoor fitness architecture. Since calisthenics parks are designed for intense physical activity, architects must prioritize materials and designs that minimize the risk of injury. Soft, durable surfaces such as rubberized surfaces or mulch are used to cushion falls and reduce impact, providing a comfortable surface for users to land on during dynamic exercises. Additionally, equipment is often made from weather-resistant materials like stainless steel or reinforced plastics, ensuring durability and safety in all weather conditions.

Proper spacing between equipment is also key to reducing the risk of accidents. By carefully planning the layout, architects can prevent overcrowding and create safe zones for different types of exercises. This not only ensures that users can work out without fear of injury but also enhances the overall experience by providing a well-organized and functional space. The most successful calisthenics parks are designed not only by architects but also by individuals who understand exercise dynamics, movement flow, and the spatial requirements for various exercises. These should be designers who understand and can carefully consider how much space is needed for different movements and ensure that the layout supports a natural, intuitive flow from one exercise to the next, creating a seamless routine for users to follow.

3. Functionality: Balancing Form and Fitness

The functionality of a calisthenics park is at the core of its design. These parks are often equipped with a variety of apparatuses such as pull-up bars, parallel bars, monkey bars, and dip stations, each carefully placed to encourage different bodyweight exercises.

Tying this back to Aldo van Eyck’s playground designs, both his work and modern calisthenics parks share core principles in how they are thoughtfully crafted to encourage natural movement and interaction. Both types of spaces are designed with intention, promoting seamless physical activity and engagement with the environment. Van Eyck’s playgrounds were also known for their balance between form and function—he designed play spaces with simple, geometric forms that allowed children to engage intuitively with their environment. Similarly, in calisthenics parks, the placement of equipment such as pull-up bars, parallel bars, and dip stations is thoughtfully arranged to promote a natural flow of movement, enabling users to transition seamlessly from one exercise to another.

Both Van Eyck’s playgrounds and modern calisthenics parks prioritize adaptability, creating flexible spaces that cater to diverse needs. Just as Van Eyck’s designs invited open-ended play and exploration, calisthenics parks often feature multipurpose areas for stretching, yoga, or group fitness activities. This flexibility enhances the usability of the space, making it accessible for a variety of fitness levels and goals, much like Van Eyck’s approach allowed for different ways of play and interaction. The overarching goal in both cases is to create environments that encourage physical activity, social interaction, and personal exploration in a way that feels natural and fluid.


Popularity of Calisthenics After the Pandemic

The rise of calisthenics parks in urban environments has highlighted a key realization: people don’t need much to stay fit and active. With minimal equipment, the simplicity of calisthenics underscores how accessible fitness can be, without the need for costly gym memberships or complex machines.

The popularity of calisthenics has surged following the COVID-19 pandemic, as people sought out simple, equipment-free ways to stay fit during lockdowns. Without access to gyms, many turned to bodyweight exercises, discovering the effectiveness of calisthenics for building strength, flexibility and endurance. The pandemic highlighted the value of functional movement, or, exercises that mimic real-life activities and improve mobility, balance and coordination. Cities have embraced this idea by integrating calisthenics parks into urban planning. These open-air fitness spaces are strategically placed in neighborhoods, parks and public areas, allowing people to easily incorporate exercise into their daily routines. By making these parks widely available, cities help remove barriers to physical activity, promoting healthy living through accessible and free fitness opportunities.

Moreover, the presence of these parks fosters a sense of community, encouraging social interaction as people gather to work out together (another significant element that people were missing during the lockdowns). Whether someone is a beginner or a seasoned athlete, the shared space invites everyone to engage in physical activity without the need for expensive gear or memberships. The city plays a pivotal role in creating an environment where fitness is integrated into everyday life, demonstrating that staying active doesn’t require much more than motivation and the right space.


The Future of Outdoor Fitness Architecture

The rise of calisthenics parks reflects a broader shift toward incorporating fitness into public spaces, making exercise more accessible and enjoyable for urban populations. Through thoughtful design, architects play a key role in ensuring that these parks are safe, functional, and inclusive. As more cities embrace the concept of outdoor fitness, we can expect to see even more innovative approaches to calisthenics park design, blending aesthetics, sustainability, and functionality to create spaces that promote health and well-being.

As someone who firmly believes in the importance of fitness in our daily lives, for a multitude of reasons, the rise of outdoor fitness spaces fills me with optimism for the future. These parks not only enhance the urban landscape but also improve people’s quality of life. If fitness is as vital as it should be, architects and urban planners have a tremendous opportunity to shape cities in ways that promote health, wellness, and community engagement. By designing spaces that encourage physical activity, they can positively impact both individual well-being and the vibrancy of our urban environments.

The post Outdoor Fitness Architecture: The Rise of Calisthenics Parks appeared first on Journal.

“Architecture Schools Need To Stop Glorifying Modernism. Change My Mind.”

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

Back in my second year of university, one of the professors handed out a questionnaire before starting his course, so that he could get to know us better.

More than five years later, I only remember two of those questions —“What’s the last book you read?” (I was secretly re-reading the Harry Potter series at the time and for some reason this question made me feel exposed, so it stayed with me) and “Name at least five architects you know.” So for the second question, like any good architecture student, I listed the usual suspects — Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Frank Lloyd Wright, and a couple of big names from my country’s modernist glory days to mix things up.

Afterward, when I talked to my classmates, it turned out we all gave pretty similar answers. Everyone named the same modernist icons, the kind of figures you’d expect to find in any architecture textbook. The funny thing is, this isn’t just a one-time experience. A variation of that question —“Who’s your favorite architect?” — pops up all the time in the industry, whether you’re meeting colleagues or sitting through interviews. And, more often than not, the answers are not far from the ones in my school questionnaire.

This begs the question: why are we still glorifying these same figures from a movement that peaked almost a century ago? A lot has happened in architecture since then — bold ideas, new challenges, creative solutions. So why are we still stuck idolizing modernism? And more importantly, what’s the negative impact?


How Modernism Came to Dominate Architecture Schools

To understand why modernism has such a hold on architectural education, it helps to look back at the early 20th century, when the movement first gained traction. With the industrial revolution ushering in new materials and mass production techniques, modernism emerged as a practical response to a world increasingly focused on efficiency and functionality.

Architects like Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier and Walter Gropius championed ideas like “form follows function” and minimalism, favoring clean lines and functional spaces over unnecessary embellishment.

These architects didn’t just influence design however. They also played a key role in shaping architectural education as we know it. Gropius founded the Bauhaus, a school that revolutionized design thinking, while Mies led the Illinois Institute of Technology, embedding modernist ideals directly into the curriculum. Their ideas resonated in a world that was rebuilding after war, where simplicity and practicality made sense for a society focused on progress and efficiency.

Modernism quickly became the dominant philosophy in schools, not just because it was new and exciting at the time, but because it was practical. Its principles — like focusing on the essentials and prioritizing function — were easy to teach and apply. Over time, these ideas solidified into the foundation of most architecture programs around the world.

Today, those same principles are still prevalent. Modernist concepts such as “less is more” continue to be emphasized in classrooms and it’s easy to see why — they offer a straightforward, logical approach to design. But while these ideas remain valuable, they’ve also become a bit of a default mode in architectural education. The challenge now is that the world has evolved and the issues architects face today require a broader range of thinking and solutions.

That’s not to say modernism doesn’t have its place — it absolutely does. But it’s time for schools to start balancing these foundational ideas with a focus on more contemporary approaches that address the complexities of the present day.


The Negative Impacts of Glorifying Modernism

While the movement’s legacy is undeniable, continuing to center it in architectural education comes with its own set of challenges.

Focusing heavily on modernism limits students’ exposure to the diverse range of architectural styles and movements that have emerged since. By repeatedly emphasizing figures like Mies van der Rohe and Le Corbusier, schools often leave out more contemporary and culturally diverse approaches, giving students an outdated or incomplete understanding of architecture’s potential — and the ways that diverse knowledges have been erased by modern’s hegemony. Indeed, this narrow focus not only restricts their appreciation of global design but also discourages the exploration of new, context-driven ideas that better align with today’s architectural landscape.

Like any other historical movement, modernism was a product of its time, responding to the needs of post-war industrialization and urbanization. Its clean lines, minimalist principles and functionalist ideals made sense in an era focused on rapid rebuilding. But today’s architects face a different set of challenges — sustainability, climate change and the need for cultural sensitivity in a globalized world. Modernist ideals, rooted in the past, often fail to address these pressing concerns, yet many schools continue to prioritize them. The heavy reliance on materials like concrete, steel and glass (symbols of progress back then) doesn’t align with today’s emphasis on eco-friendly practices. And modernism’s one-size-fits-all approach often overlooks cultural nuances, which are critical in today’s diverse and interconnected world.

Moreover, treating modernism as the gold standard can stifle creativity. When students are repeatedly taught to value minimalism and functionalism above all else, they often fall into the trap of replicating these aesthetics without considering alternative approaches. (It’s safe to say that many of us were guilty of this at some point.)

This emphasis on staying within the confines of modernist thinking can make students hesitant to break away from the mold or experiment with unconventional materials, forms or ideas. In the end, they risk becoming designers who reproduce the past rather than pushing the boundaries of what architecture could be.


What Should Architectural Education Focus on Instead?

While modernism has shaped how architecture is taught, it’s time to broaden the perspective. The world is facing new challenges and architects need to keep up. Schools should be encouraging students to explore more than just the classics — there’s so much happening in contemporary design, from sustainable architecture to experimental projects using cutting-edge technology.

Today’s architects have a lot on their plates. It’s not just about whether form follows function or vice versa anymore. Issues like climate change, urban sprawl and social equity are at the forefront of design. Instead of relying solely on traditional design principles, students should be learning how to address these real-world challenges directly. How can buildings reduce their carbon footprint? How can urban spaces become more inclusive and livable? These are the kinds of questions that need to take center stage.

Students should feel empowered to break away from the mold and explore new materials, forms and solutions. To achieve this, schools need to equip them with the tools to think critically and creatively, allowing them to push the boundaries of traditional design.

The good news is—some schools are already taking steps in this direction. At the University of British Columbia, for example, sustainability and cultural sensitivity are key parts of the curriculum. Over at ETH Zurich, students are diving into experimental design and using technology to rethink how buildings are made. These schools are showing that there’s a way to honor architectural history while also preparing students for the future.


Time to Let Le Corbusier Rest For a Bit

The biggest takeaway here is that modernism had its time, but architecture has evolved and so must our approach to education. The continued glorification of modernist icons keeps students anchored to a past that doesn’t fully address the pressing challenges of today — whether it’s sustainability, social equity or the complexities of urbanization. Clinging to these old frameworks limits creativity and narrows the scope of what architecture can achieve in our rapidly changing world.

That’s not to say we should disregard the past completely. In fact, studying modernism provides valuable lessons, but it’s important to balance that with a forward-thinking mindset. For those searching for examples of what architecture looks like when it embraces new ideas, Architizer’s World’s Best Architecture offers a window into groundbreaking projects that are redefining design today. These award-winning works show just how much is possible when architecture moves beyond outdated ideals and welcomes bold, innovative approaches.

In the end, modernism isn’t going anywhere, but it doesn’t need to be the centerpiece. It’s time to appreciate it as one chapter in architecture’s story, while focusing on what comes next.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The post “Architecture Schools Need To Stop Glorifying Modernism. Change My Mind.” appeared first on Journal.

Notre Dame: Transforming Tragedy Into an Architectural Journey

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

Having just returned from Paris, I had the unique opportunity to witness the restoration efforts of the Notre Dame Cathedral firsthand. More than just a response to the tragic fire of 2019, the reconstruction of this iconic landmark has become an educational opportunity for visitors and Parisians alike. As scaffolding surrounds the once vibrant heart of this Gothic architecture, the city of Paris has created an informative journey around the closed-off cathedral, offering a window into both the past and future of Notre Dame.

What I truly appreciated about this approach was how the city turned the tragedy into an educational and informative experience for visitors and passersby. Instead of quietly reconstructing the building, they offered detailed insights into the cathedral’s history and the restoration process, including efforts to preserve its architectural integrity and historical significance. They also highlighted the proactive measures being taken to protect it from future disasters.


A Glimpse into the Past: The History of Notre Dame

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

Notre Dame de Paris, a icon of French Gothic architecture, has stood as a symbol of Parisian culture, art and history since its foundation in 1163. Over the centuries, it has witnessed revolutions, wars and transformations, becoming a symbol not only of the Catholic Church but also of French national identity. The cathedral’s twin towers, rose windows and intricate façade are considered architectural marvels, with countless generations contributing to its ongoing preservation.

The fire of April 15, 2019, however, threatened to erase centuries of history. The blaze caused the collapse of the iconic spire and severely damaged the roof, shocking the world and igniting discussions about the fragility of cultural heritage. What emerged from this tragedy was not just sorrow but a global commitment to restore Notre Dame to its former glory. And now, the reconstruction effort has become a living lesson in history, architecture, and engineering.

I had completely forgotten about the Notre Dame reconstruction while in Paris, but as soon as I spotted the iconic twin towers near the Seine, it all came rushing back. That view drew me to the restoration site, and to my pleasant surprise, I discovered informative displays explaining the entire ongoing process, allowing me to learn a lot. It was a reminder of the cathedral’s enduring presence, even in the midst of its transformation.


The Restoration Timeline: From Tragedy to Rebirth

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

The restoration of Notre Dame is progressing along a carefully structured timeline, driven by the desire to faithfully restore the cathedral while ensuring its resilience for future generations. Visitors can explore a timeline surrounding the cathedral, filled with informative text, images, photos and diagrams that outline the step-by-step process of the reconstruction, offering insight into the complexities involved in rebuilding such a historic structure. Immediately following the fire, the initial focus was on stabilizing the structure, ensuring that no further damage would occur. The removal of the melted scaffolding, installed during pre-fire renovation efforts, was a delicate and essential task that took months to complete. In the meantime, the process of cleaning the interior walls and stained glass windows began, revealing the beauty that lay beneath layers of soot and debris.

Current efforts are now focused on rebuilding the damaged roof and fully restoring the spire, designed by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc in the 19th century. Construction experts and historians have committed to using traditional materials and techniques as much as possible, echoing the craftsmanship of the original builders. Oak from sustainable forests across France has been selected for the roof’s timber frame, while artisans carefully recreate the intricate stone carvings and stained glass lost in the fire. The city brought in dozens of French craftsmen, each with specialized skills, to work on the various intricate aspects of the restoration project. The collaboration and the number of skilled workers involved is truly remarkable.


Strategy and Construction: A Balance of Tradition and Innovation

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris, Photo by Ema Bakalova

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

While the guiding principle is to restore Notre Dame as faithfully as possible, modern construction techniques and technologies are being integrated to prevent future disasters. This balance of tradition and innovation is perhaps the most fascinating aspect of the restoration effort. To prevent the spread of fire, two full firewalls were installed to divide the attic and roof into three separate sections. The roof and spire are being rebuilt with a focus on fire prevention, incorporating advanced fireproofing materials that were unavailable in the past. Additionally, detection and sprinkler systems will be discreetly integrated into the structure to ensure that any future fire risks are minimized if high temperatures are detected. These modern safeguards are essential in ensuring that the cathedral will endure future challenges while preserving its authenticity.

One of the most educational aspects of the restoration effort is how it bridges the old with the new. Master craftsmen are applying medieval building techniques, while drone technology, 3D scanning and virtual modeling are being used to guide the reconstruction process. These advanced technologies allow experts to map out every detail of the cathedral and ensure that the restoration is as accurate as possible.


Educational Journey: Turning Restoration into Public Learning

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

What sets this restoration effort apart is its accessibility to the public. As mentioned earlier, the city of Paris has transformed the perimeter of the closed cathedral into an open-air  classroom for visitors, offering a unique educational experience.

This approach has allowed the public — the locals and the millions of visitors — to engage with and learn from the reconstruction process. This transparency not only educates visitors about the historical significance and architectural details of the cathedral, but it also fosters a deeper appreciation for the craftsmanship and effort involved in preserving such a cultural landmark. Additionally, it turns a tragedy into a teaching opportunity, highlighting modern restoration techniques and fire prevention measures while ensuring that Notre Dame’s legacy is accessible to future generations.


Safeguarding the Future: A Testament to Endurance

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

Notre Dame’s restoration is not only about faithfully bringing back what was lost but also about preparing the cathedral for the future. The tragedy of the fire has prompted architects and engineers to think critically about how best to safeguard the building from future threats. While maintaining the historic authenticity of the cathedral, the incorporation of modern technologies ensures that Notre Dame will be better protected moving forward. The ongoing restoration of Notre Dame offers a profound example of how tragedy can be transformed into opportunity. What could have been a story of loss and destruction has instead become an inspiring tale of resilience, innovation and education. As Paris restores this iconic cathedral, it does so not only with a commitment to honoring the past but also with a vision for the future.

By incorporating modern technology, adhering to traditional craftsmanship and offering the public a rare educational experience, the restoration of Notre Dame is a testament to the enduring power of cultural heritage. In this unique intersection of history and innovation, the cathedral’s reconstruction stands as a symbol of hope and renewal, ensuring that Notre Dame will continue to inspire generations to come.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

The post Notre Dame: Transforming Tragedy Into an Architectural Journey appeared first on Journal.

Notre Dame: Transforming Tragedy Into an Architectural Journey

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

Having just returned from Paris, I had the unique opportunity to witness the restoration efforts of the Notre Dame Cathedral firsthand. More than just a response to the tragic fire of 2019, the reconstruction of this iconic landmark has become an educational opportunity for visitors and Parisians alike. As scaffolding surrounds the once vibrant heart of this Gothic architecture, the city of Paris has created an informative journey around the closed-off cathedral, offering a window into both the past and future of Notre Dame.

What I truly appreciated about this approach was how the city turned the tragedy into an educational and informative experience for visitors and passersby. Instead of quietly reconstructing the building, they offered detailed insights into the cathedral’s history and the restoration process, including efforts to preserve its architectural integrity and historical significance. They also highlighted the proactive measures being taken to protect it from future disasters.


A Glimpse into the Past: The History of Notre Dame

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

Notre Dame de Paris, a icon of French Gothic architecture, has stood as a symbol of Parisian culture, art and history since its foundation in 1163. Over the centuries, it has witnessed revolutions, wars and transformations, becoming a symbol not only of the Catholic Church but also of French national identity. The cathedral’s twin towers, rose windows and intricate façade are considered architectural marvels, with countless generations contributing to its ongoing preservation.

The fire of April 15, 2019, however, threatened to erase centuries of history. The blaze caused the collapse of the iconic spire and severely damaged the roof, shocking the world and igniting discussions about the fragility of cultural heritage. What emerged from this tragedy was not just sorrow but a global commitment to restore Notre Dame to its former glory. And now, the reconstruction effort has become a living lesson in history, architecture, and engineering.

I had completely forgotten about the Notre Dame reconstruction while in Paris, but as soon as I spotted the iconic twin towers near the Seine, it all came rushing back. That view drew me to the restoration site, and to my pleasant surprise, I discovered informative displays explaining the entire ongoing process, allowing me to learn a lot. It was a reminder of the cathedral’s enduring presence, even in the midst of its transformation.


The Restoration Timeline: From Tragedy to Rebirth

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

The restoration of Notre Dame is progressing along a carefully structured timeline, driven by the desire to faithfully restore the cathedral while ensuring its resilience for future generations. Visitors can explore a timeline surrounding the cathedral, filled with informative text, images, photos and diagrams that outline the step-by-step process of the reconstruction, offering insight into the complexities involved in rebuilding such a historic structure. Immediately following the fire, the initial focus was on stabilizing the structure, ensuring that no further damage would occur. The removal of the melted scaffolding, installed during pre-fire renovation efforts, was a delicate and essential task that took months to complete. In the meantime, the process of cleaning the interior walls and stained glass windows began, revealing the beauty that lay beneath layers of soot and debris.

Current efforts are now focused on rebuilding the damaged roof and fully restoring the spire, designed by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc in the 19th century. Construction experts and historians have committed to using traditional materials and techniques as much as possible, echoing the craftsmanship of the original builders. Oak from sustainable forests across France has been selected for the roof’s timber frame, while artisans carefully recreate the intricate stone carvings and stained glass lost in the fire. The city brought in dozens of French craftsmen, each with specialized skills, to work on the various intricate aspects of the restoration project. The collaboration and the number of skilled workers involved is truly remarkable.


Strategy and Construction: A Balance of Tradition and Innovation

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris, Photo by Ema Bakalova

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

While the guiding principle is to restore Notre Dame as faithfully as possible, modern construction techniques and technologies are being integrated to prevent future disasters. This balance of tradition and innovation is perhaps the most fascinating aspect of the restoration effort. To prevent the spread of fire, two full firewalls were installed to divide the attic and roof into three separate sections. The roof and spire are being rebuilt with a focus on fire prevention, incorporating advanced fireproofing materials that were unavailable in the past. Additionally, detection and sprinkler systems will be discreetly integrated into the structure to ensure that any future fire risks are minimized if high temperatures are detected. These modern safeguards are essential in ensuring that the cathedral will endure future challenges while preserving its authenticity.

One of the most educational aspects of the restoration effort is how it bridges the old with the new. Master craftsmen are applying medieval building techniques, while drone technology, 3D scanning and virtual modeling are being used to guide the reconstruction process. These advanced technologies allow experts to map out every detail of the cathedral and ensure that the restoration is as accurate as possible.


Educational Journey: Turning Restoration into Public Learning

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

What sets this restoration effort apart is its accessibility to the public. As mentioned earlier, the city of Paris has transformed the perimeter of the closed cathedral into an open-air  classroom for visitors, offering a unique educational experience.

This approach has allowed the public — the locals and the millions of visitors — to engage with and learn from the reconstruction process. This transparency not only educates visitors about the historical significance and architectural details of the cathedral, but it also fosters a deeper appreciation for the craftsmanship and effort involved in preserving such a cultural landmark. Additionally, it turns a tragedy into a teaching opportunity, highlighting modern restoration techniques and fire prevention measures while ensuring that Notre Dame’s legacy is accessible to future generations.


Safeguarding the Future: A Testament to Endurance

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Photo by Ema Bakalova

Notre Dame’s restoration is not only about faithfully bringing back what was lost but also about preparing the cathedral for the future. The tragedy of the fire has prompted architects and engineers to think critically about how best to safeguard the building from future threats. While maintaining the historic authenticity of the cathedral, the incorporation of modern technologies ensures that Notre Dame will be better protected moving forward. The ongoing restoration of Notre Dame offers a profound example of how tragedy can be transformed into opportunity. What could have been a story of loss and destruction has instead become an inspiring tale of resilience, innovation and education. As Paris restores this iconic cathedral, it does so not only with a commitment to honoring the past but also with a vision for the future.

By incorporating modern technology, adhering to traditional craftsmanship and offering the public a rare educational experience, the restoration of Notre Dame is a testament to the enduring power of cultural heritage. In this unique intersection of history and innovation, the cathedral’s reconstruction stands as a symbol of hope and renewal, ensuring that Notre Dame will continue to inspire generations to come.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

The post Notre Dame: Transforming Tragedy Into an Architectural Journey appeared first on Journal.