Entradas

Visual Vignettes: An Interior Designer’s Guide to Creating Memorable Moments

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

As designers, we often see our projects in 2D, working with layers and lines to produce plans and elevations that could easily be considered artworks in their own right. To the trained eye, a well-drawn elevation is a thing of beauty. Our drawings are a place where, through the deep understanding of space and dimension that is common to designers, we can experiment with the intricacies of form and placement to explore the interaction between objects. Yet, the true magic happens when the successful elevation drawings are translated into reality, a skill that can transform spaces into immersive environments that captivate and inspire visitors.

“Visual Vignettes” are carefully composed moments within an interior design scheme that capture the balance of a two-dimensional elevation while harnessing the user’s or visitor’s sensory perceptions. They result from bridging the gap between the theoretical and the tangible. Visual vignettes are where the art of designing meets the science of space planning, turning abstract lines and shapes into moments. By thoughtfully manipulating light, texture, scale, and other parameters, designers can craft these vignettes to instill emotion and create memorable spaces — as is exemplified in this year’s A+Award-winning projects.

NeueHouse Venice Beach by Loescher Meachem Architects and DesignAgency, Los Angeles, California | Popular Choice Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Remote Work and Coworking Space

Establishing focal points is a great place to begin when building a visual vignette within a space. The aim is to guide the viewer’s eye and create a clear visual hierarchy. By creating a focal point in a space, your aim is to draw attention to a specific area or object, making certain that a chosen element or area stands out. These could be created by specifying a striking piece of furniture, highlighting unique architectural features, or choosing an artwork that effectively illustrates the desired atmosphere for the space. Intelligent placement of focal points in a room allows a designer to direct a visitor’s gaze with purpose to coordinate a sense of order and reaffirm the intended narrative of the space.

When striving to create visual vignettes, the principle of balance is key. Balance in a space ensures that no single element overshadows the others. For the person experiencing a space, balance or lack of it is one of those feelings we can never really put our finger on. When it’s right, typically, a user will feel a sense of comfort. When it’s not, a sense of uneasiness that cannot be determined is common. There are many ways to achieve balance in a design. However, two of the simplest to master are based on humanity’s innermost desire for order and ordered chaos.

Tree O’clock — Villa Qabalah by Studio Locomotive, Phuket, Thailand | Photos by Beer Singnoi | Jury Winner and Popular Choice Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Mixed Use (S <25,000 sq ft)

As you’ve probably noticed, humans enjoy symmetry. It appeals to us on both a conscious and subconscious level, providing a sense of aesthetic pleasure and cognitive ease. It makes us think of health and stability and off—ers a sense of order. In interior design, symmetry shows up all the time. Think about in bedrooms with headboards, bedside tables and lamps. Or fireplaces with mantels centered on a lounge wall. As designers, we can introduce symmetry in subtle ways, for example, by framing areas with a set of curtains or choosing patterns that are symmetrical in design; even how we style shelving can bring symmetry into a design and instill harmony into a space.

Conversely, asymmetrical choices can also be highly effective. In this instance, designers use visual weight to capture a sense of balance as opposed to having an exact reflection. By grouping different elements of equal visual weight, we can achieve equilibrium while creating a more dynamic and intriguing composition. For instance, balancing a large piece of art with a cluster of smaller objet d’art items brings a lively yet cohesive feel. Similarly, a large armchair is flanked by nesting tables and a floor lamp — the varying heights and weights make the arrangements both engaging and balanced.

Building on the foundation of balance, composition and proportion are crucial to ensuring that each of the elements in a space relate well to each other. To achieve cohesion, many designers turn to established proportional strategies to guarantee pleasing relationships. “The Rule of Thirds” is often used to prevent monotony by introducing our old friend dynamic asymmetry, guiding the gaze through the space in an engaging manner. Adopting a well-understood idea like “The Golden Ratio” replicates the kind of organic balance we would typically experience in nature, making the composition of a space feel inherently satisfying in a primal way. Equally, designs that follow a grid system rely on proportions and the relative size of elements to ensure unity and balance.

House FC by fws_work, Taipei, Taiwan | Photos by Suiyu | Jury Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Apartment

This idea of grid systems can be used to great effect when making visual vignettes. Rhythm and repetition are excellent at mimicking a sense of movement that has continuity. By deliberately repeating design elements, designers can establish a visual flow that appeals to users. There are many ways to do this and different types of rhythm to try and create. Regular rhythm involves consistent intervals, equal spacing and positioning. Think of a corridor of artwork, all the same size in the same frames or a pathway flanked by the same species of tree.

Alternating rhythm introduces variety, using two different repeating elements that alternate back and forth. This could be a checkered floor or striped wallpaper. Progressive rhythm uses gradual variations, color gradients, or light washes, which are common ways to introduce progressive rhythm into a design. Random rhythm scatters elements in a planned yet spontaneous manner. This can be used effectively when designing shelving units, making each opening unique while consistent material and color bring cohesion. Introducing rhythm into a design can make a space feel both unified and engaging, creating a visual journey that truly captivates and holds a visitor’s attention.

Liminal House by McLeod Bovell Modern Houses, West Vancouver, Canada | Photos by Hufton and Crow | Jury Winner and Popular Choice Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Residential Interiors (>3000 sq ft)

Finally, contrast is one of the simplest yet most powerful tools for creating a visual vignette. By juxtaposing different elements, such as texture, color, material and even something as basic as shadow and light, it is easy to create visual interest and highlight key features. Contrast, for example, using dark and light woods together or a high gloss finish paired with matte surfaces, allows elements to stand out from one another and adds further depth to a design. Effective use of contrast ensures that key elements capture attention, enhancing the overall visual appeal and dynamism of the composition.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

The post Visual Vignettes: An Interior Designer’s Guide to Creating Memorable Moments appeared first on Journal.

“Yposkafo:” Digging Deeper Into Greece’s Wildly Popular Undercut Architectural Typology

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

Yposkafo, Greece’s undercut residential typology, opens up a subterranean world within the Greek island landscape. Different morphologies, techniques and processes have produced some of the quirkiest yet breathtaking architecture in the Greek rural topographies. Still, the origins of this architectural typology remain under-explored and, more importantly, so is the impact of such construction on the rough, untamed terrain of the island countryside.

Only a decade ago, yposkafo was primarily found on the islands of Santorini and Therasia. Because their soil is volcanic and thus quite malleable, this approach allowed builders to carve homes directly into the rock, usually underneath other buildings. Yet, today, all Greek islands are filled with yposkafo residences, many of which have received an award for architectural excellence.

This proliferation may be attributed to a building regulation law passed in 2012, allowing architects to build up to an additional 50% of the plot’s allowed square feet as long as the residence is partially under the earth. These legal parameters were an attempt to provide more homes and hotels and boost the tourist sector while at the same time preserving the islands’ natural landscape.

01_DECA_Aloni_Reeve_2

Aloni by Deca Architecture, Antiparos, Greece | Built in 2008, this site-sensitive yposkafo design was constructed four years before the government passed legislation promoting this approach. 

This architectural, political and economic move has led to the development of countless undercut residences, which admittedly do not always comply with the necessary regulations and have, as a result, instigated ample negative criticism in the past couple of years. Issues such as overbuilding, lack of the necessary infrastructure to sustain and support such buildings as well as the immense carbon footprint generated from all the supply transportation to the islands from the main country has achieved the exact opposite result: the deterioration of the natural landscape as well as the resource exploitation of most Greek islands.

Nevertheless, there is another, more optimistic side to the yposkafo typology. Even though this particular law has generated an overwhelming surge of newly built structures, it has unlocked a different approach to architectural conservation. More specifically, the alternative would be to faithfully preserve the existing Cycladic typology: small, one- to two-story white cubic houses situated on the steep island cliffs. If this type of structure were to spread as extensively as the yposkafo architecture, the islands would literally turned white.

The project LIKNON by k-studio is an excellent example that showcases the benefits of placing a building into the ground. LIKNON is a museum dedicated to the well-known Metaxa brand of premium Greek brandy, situated in a 100 year old vineyard in the island of Samos. The building is integrated into the landscape, immersing the visitors underground to get in touch with the brand’s history and eventually leading them to a series of stone terraces above the building, where the vines for the brandy are cultivated. The museum acts as an extension of the vineyard, without disrupting the natural scenery or the actual ecology of the place and thus suggesting a new, bioclimatic angle of the yposkafo typology.

03_Liknon_001_ClausBrechenmacherReinerBaumann

02_Liknon_001_ClausBrechenmacherReinerBaumann

LIKNON by K-Studio, Samos Prefecture, Greece | Jury Winner, 11th Annual A+Awards, Architecture +Stone

Apart from conserving the existing topography of the landscape as well as the local flora and fauna, undercut structures also maintain ideal temperatures in their interior. With the ground acting as a layer of natural insulation, yposkafo buildings offer unparalleled thermal comfort without the need of additional ventilation or cooling systems.

At the same time, during the excavation process, a lot of the ground’s material can be stored and reused, minimizing any unnecessary material waste. PetrA, a project designed by react architects, is a residence located in Paros and is purely made of the stone extracted from the excavation. It is comprised of thick walls and solid, heavy roofs, forming a new “artificial” rocky terrain, which is then utilized for agricultural cultivation as well as animal herding. This simple, morphological gesture contributes to the island’s overall economy without pulling from available resources.

02_PetrA_reactArchitects

01_PetrA_reactArchitects

PetrA by react architects, Paros, Greece | Popular Choice Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Architecture+Stone

When thinking about the negatives and positives of the proliferation of the yposkafo typology across the Cycladic landscapes, one can’t help but think of a quote by the ancient Greek philosopher Cleobulus: “all in moderation.”

The yposkafo typology started as an attempt to boost the Greek economy whilst preserving the landscape’s natural beauty, an action which has sadly escalated to the uncontrollable construction of oftentimes unnecessary luxurious tourist homes. Still, the solution is not to regress to the old impractical — albeit beautiful — white characteristic cubes, nor should the county’s natural heritage be sacrificed in the sake of profit.

Recognizing the functional, environmental, cultural and financial benefits of the yposkafo typology, architects, governing bodies and the wider society have an opportunity to experiment and introduce a different approach to heritage conservation — one where context becomes not only a conceptual but also a material building foundation.

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

Featured Image: LIKNON by K-Studio, A+Awards Finalist 2023, Concepts Architecture+Landscape

The post “Yposkafo:” Digging Deeper Into Greece’s Wildly Popular Undercut Architectural Typology appeared first on Journal.

The Future of Architecture: How Today’s 3D-Printed Projects Could Shape Tomorrow’s Urban Landscape

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

In 1981, Dr. Hideo Kodama invented the first rapid prototyping machine. A couple of years later, in 1986, Chuck Hull filed the first patent for stereolithography (SLA). Even though it was not apparent at the time, both inventors changed the course of manufacturing forever. One of the most significant advantages of 3D printing is its ability to materialize complex designs with impressive speed and precision while using specific amounts of the material necessary, thus reducing waste. In parallel, 3D printing technology is also democratizing manufacturing by allowing small firms and individuals to participate in their own custom components.

Even though architects are highly aware of the benefits of such technology and have witnessed countless 3D printing applications, the scale of these endeavors has primarily remained quite small. In the realm of architecture and construction, 3D printing is mostly used to print models of the actual designs rather than the design itself. Issues such as technical limitations, the lack of large-scale printers as well as concerns about material durability pose significant challenges. Still, what if we could 3D print entire cities? What kind of future settings and applications would this technology unlock?

213 Third Avenue by KUSHNER studios Architecture & Design PC, Brooklyn, New York | Popular Choice Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Architecture +Models and Rendering | This 14-story new residential building, planned for construction, will feature a unique ground floor system of two-story high 3D printed commercial entryways and storefronts. The company producing the 3D components is an offshoot of the designer’s architectural practice, allowing a unique delivery methodology that bypasses many of the traditional conflicts present in the current traditional architect-contractor paradigm.


Scenario 01: The Circular Metropolis

It is 2060 and a newly established city situated in Munich’s outskirts, entirely constructed using eco-friendly 3D printing materials. Walls, slabs and roofs are made of concrete, synthesized by the water and soil found on site. Disintegratable resin is used for windows and glass panels, while furniture and utility devices are 3D printed using locally sourced metals and alloys. The Circular Metropolis is primarily a research center and home to innovators who have majored in material science and aspire to develop robust and long-lasting material composites.

01_HouseZero

House Zero by ICON and Lake|Flato Architects, Austin, Texas Jury Winner, Architecture +Experimental Design; Jury Winner, Architecture +New Technlogy, 11th Annual A+Awards

Back in 2022, House Zero, located in Austin, Texas, was completed. The project was materialized by using a 9500 pound robot that 3D printed the entirety of the residence’s walls made of a proprietary cementitious-based material dubbed “Lavacrete,” insulation, and some steel for reinforcing. The material provides increased insulation, forming an air-tight wall that slows the heat transfer into the home.


Scenario 02: The Rapid Relief Disaster Zone

On June 19th, 2043, San Francisco is devastated by a major tsunami, destroying most parts of the city. Within days of the disaster, large-scale 3D printing arms are deployed, creating temporary shelters in just a couple of hours. Over the following months, residents are contributing to the reconstruction of their homes and the city’s infrastructure, designing components and feeding them into 3D printing robots, situated all over the city. 3D printed levees and barriers are installed to protect against future flooding, turning San Francisco into an urban design model for disaster response.

02_Striatus_BRG-ZHA

Striatus 3D Printed Bridge by Zaha Hadid Architects, Venice, Italy Jury Winner, Architecture +Concrete, 12th Annual A+Awards

In 2021, an arched masonry footbridge composed of 3D printed concrete blocks that demand no mortar or reinforcement was exhibited at the Giardini della Marinaressa during the Venice Architecture Biennale. Known as Striatus, this “striated” compression-only structure is made of flexible, interlocking building blocks, which could become dismantled and reassembled to respond to any context or functional requirement.


Scenario 03: The Heritage Preservation District

In 2037, the restoration works for the Acropolis in Athens are coming to a close. Using precise 3D printed replicas of the damaged building elements, a series of parts are produced to “fill in the gaps” of the ancient temples. The components are 3D printed out of a special pigment made of marble dust, ensuring longevity and durability, while at the same time blending seamlessly with the existing historic structure. The success of the project has instigated a new conservation program that aims to use the same processes and technologies to restore the array of deteriorating neoclassical buildings currently scattered within Athens’ historic city centre.

02_Studio_RAP_DelftPassage_Riccardo_De_Vecchi

New Delft Blue by Studio RAP, Delft, Netherlands

In 2023, the project New Delft Blue, situated in the historic Dutch city, Delft, was completed. By integrating 3D clay printing, computational design and traditional glazing techniques, New Delft Blue set a precedent by reinterpreting traditional ceramic ornamentation and creating its contemporary 21st century version, unfolding a new architectural restoration potential based on the design language of Delft Blue porcelain.


Scenario 04: The Mars Colony

In 2100, a self-sustaining colony on Mars is constructed using entirely  3D printing technology with locally (i.e. interplanetary) sourced materials. The colony consists of domes and tunnels, designed to protect inhabitants from harsh Martian conditions. Colonists use 3D printers to create durable and insulated structures, made of regolith (MaDtian soil), functioning as greenhouses that provide fresh food, shelters and recycling centers. The portability and ease-of-use of these extraterrestrial 3d printers allow colonists to construct additional structures to accommodate their ever-growing community.

The village of Darak is an area in Iran where the sea surrounds the sand dunes of the desert. In 2025, the construction of the Sandy Darak Pavilion will be completed. The structure is materialized through a special 3D printer, which can use endemic materials, such as clay and sand. In parallel, by using a layer-by-layer construction method, the form is gradually created without any harm or disruption to the environment and the natural surroundings.


This juxtaposition between projects that are currently materialized and potential future architectural scenarios reveal 3d printing’s immense potential. Eco-friendly materials, customizable kits-of-parts, precise components for architectural restoration as well as methods of construction that are respectful towards their context are all practices that are already becoming implemented through the 3d printing industry. By looking at today’s projects as architectural and technological prototypes, fosters an aspiration for taking these “methodologies” further and creating a future where sustainable, innovative, and contextually respectful architecture and — more importantly — its materialization becomes a reality.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

Featured Image: House Zero by ICON and Lake|Flato Architects

The post The Future of Architecture: How Today’s 3D-Printed Projects Could Shape Tomorrow’s Urban Landscape appeared first on Journal.

The Cultural Currency Urban Redevelopment: Lessons From Finland’s Oldest City

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

“When we think of big cities, we think of fast life, people rushing around, nobody has time to get to know their neighbors. I don’t think we should see it like that; it hasn’t always been like that.”

To understand Minna Arve’s perspective on urban planning, you only need to spend five minutes with her in Turku’s market square. The redesign of this historic landmark, the centerpiece of Finland’s oldest city, was completed in 2021 — meaning that we’re now sipping coffee outside the al fresco Cafe Eino on a sunny early summer morning, and the only thing interrupting our conversation with the elected mayor is the locals saying hello to her as they pass by our table.

It’s a small but significant detail that reveals plenty about how this corner of Scandinavia is rethinking the relationship between town and people. Nowhere is this more evident than the riverfront, which is undergoing the kind of monumental transformation usually reserved for Alpha and Beta metropoles, rather than a city that, albeit growing, is still home to just 200,000 or so people. On the banks of the Aura, though, major works are underway in all directions.

Artist rendition of Turku Music Hall Fuuga courtesy of PES Architects

PES-Architects’ Music Hall Fuuga is the most significant project currently underway, and expectations are high. A few minutes away, the older Turku Concert Hall continues to operate for now, the country’s first concert hall and a stunning example of mid-century Finnish modernism conceived by national architecture hero, Risto-Veikko Luukkonen.

While there was an option to renovate and regenerate, careful consideration revealed this would cost almost as much money, and still leave boxes unchecked. Not least accessibility, something Arve is clear must be prioritized when awarding new developments to master planners.

Public realm outside the forthcoming Museum of History and the Future (C) Sigge Architects

Further up the water, out towards the Baltic, there’s currently no sign of another groundbreaking moment in the city’s story which will contribute towards a new placemaking blueprint for a Cultural Riverfront. But here, at the ferry terminal, huge changes are about to take place. The port itself will be moved further out of town, a large new park will replace the tarmac area used to channel HGVs, coaches and cars onto vessels bound for Stockholm twice daily. An abhorrent use of an enviable location, alongside the planned green space will be a new cultural destination concept — the Museum of History & the Future.

The rather vague name takes some unpicking, but makes sense once you get there. The institution, due to open in 2029, will celebrate the heritage and history of Turku, and Finland as a whole. Exhibitions will look to progressive formats and cutting edge technology to immerse visitors, with the building itself reflecting this remit. Enter local firm Sigge Architects, who were awarded the commission based on their unique proposal, Squ?ma.

Location of the new Museum of History & the Future, currently part of Turku’s ferry port (C) Visit Turku

Using a ‘magazine’ approach, the design features a series of low rise, oblong structures which are autonomous yet interconnected. Constructed from dark timbers, mirroring traditional construction in the region, if all goes to plan the aesthetics should compliment the wonderfully preserved medieval castle which will cast a shadow over the site. We ask what a mayor looks for when casting their vote for a major architectural competition to create a new civic icon.

“For me, it was important to think about not how the museum will look, but how it will support the public space around it. How will it support encounters. I’ve been speaking a lot recently about the city of encounters… how we can make public space that supports people meeting each other,” Arvo replies. “This was important with the new music hall, too. How will we create the building but also the public space around it. It comes down to making these investments accessible to people. You need to promise this, but also deliver the idea that this is for everyone to use.”

 

Street furniture in the redeveloped Turku Market Square (C) Sarc + Sigge

Arvo talks about the programming of something like a concert hall, the need to diversity in a bid to improve inclusion. But she’s talking about much more than that. At a time when urbanization and immigration are putting pressure on public services and infrastructure in Finland, Turku ranking in the country’s fastest growing areas, the electorate must be convinced that spending hundreds of millions on cultural development is in their interest. Exclusivity should not apply.

“[At the Music Hall] you won’t even need to go and listen to music, just relax, enjoy the surroundings, go to the roof terrace. We need places that support these kinds of encounters. So in that sense, more important than the building is how it is reached by people,” Arvo continues, before revealing architecture is a big passion of hers, and a belief in the power of great building design. “A skilful architect can work miracles.”

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

The post The Cultural Currency Urban Redevelopment: Lessons From Finland’s Oldest City appeared first on Journal.

From Studio to Site: Navigating the Transition from Architecture School to Professional Practice

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

Dear architecture students, this one’s for you!

Transitioning from architecture school to professional practice can be both exhilarating and challenging. While architecture school provides a solid foundation in design principles and theoretical knowledge, the real-world industry introduces new dynamics, expectations, and learning opportunities. The goal of this article is to help prepare students for the realities of the architectural profession, not to discourage but to empower them for success. It will highlight the differences between the academic and professional environments and offer practical advice for recent graduates stepping into the workforce. There are many things I wish I had known before entering the professional world of architecture. I want to share my thoughts on how aspiring architects and students can successfully bridge the gap between academic training and industry realities.


Differences Between School and Real-World Practice

In architecture school, we often enjoy a level of design freedom that is unparalleled. The academic environment encourages creative and avant-garde designs, allowing us to push the boundaries of innovation and artistic expression. What truly matters isn’t whether the project can be successfully built or not; it’s the thought process and innovative ideas behind it. After all, theoretically, anything can be built, right? However, in the professional world, architects and designers must be able to find a way of balancing creativity with client needs, budgets, building codes, and zoning regulations. Client satisfaction and feasibility take precedence over purely artistic endeavors, necessitating practical and often conservative solutions.


Working in Conceptually-Focused Offices

Some offices place a stronger emphasis on concept designs and ideation. Larger firms often receive a significant amount of work from clients seeking concept designs and competition-based projects. In these environments, you can experience a level of creative freedom similar to what you find in school, but within a professional setting. If this is what you’re looking for, pursue it — apply to large firms and give it a try. However, be mindful that while it can be enjoyable for the first few years, I’ve often encountered people who have spent over a decade working solely on concept designs. While projects like this are very exciting and important for improving your concept design and design development skills, it often leaves gaps in understanding building construction and project details, which can be professionally limiting.

From my experience, different offices focus on different aspects of their work. Architecture school emphasizes developing conceptual designs and theoretical frameworks, encouraging students to think broadly and innovatively through hypothetical projects that allow for maximal creativity. While every architecture office values creative and innovative thinking, not all provide the opportunity to explore this creative workflow fully. Though practicality and functionality are paramount in professional practice, there is something wonderful about having a period early in your career where you work in intensely creative environments, pushing your conceptual ideas closer to reality.

In the end, if you do decide to become a real architect, you’ll spend years ensuring that your designs are buildable, safe, and cost-effective. Real-world projects require detailed construction documents, precise specifications, and adherence to practical constraints. I believe this is something anyone can learn, but becoming a skilled designer and honing your ability to conceptualize relevant ideas based on project conditions takes time, dedication, passion, and perhaps.. a bit of a sixth sense.


Understanding How To Work With Others

In school, projects are often individual, allowing students to develop their unique styles and ideas, fostering personal creativity and design philosophy. In fact, I recall feeling frustrated in school when I had to work with others or in a team. I preferred to handle everything myself, without anyone else’s input. However, you quickly learn that architecture is highly collaborative in the professional world. Architects work in teams and rely heavily on individuals with specialized skills, including engineers, contractors, clients, and especially their coworkers and teammates. No single person can handle everything alone; the scope of the projects are simply too vast for one individual to manage. Effective communication and teamwork are essential skills, as collaboration is crucial for the successful completion of projects.

During your years in school, feedback comes primarily from professors and peers, focusing on design principles and innovation. You may choose to follow their advice or not, but in professional practice, feedback often comes from clients, contractors, and regulatory bodies, with an emphasis on functionality, cost, and compliance. You’ll have to learn to understand your clients and their desires, and find a way to provide creative solutions while ensuring your ideas still comply with the requirements of other involved parties. This shift requires architects to develop a thicker skin and a keen ability to integrate diverse perspectives into their work.


Tips for Graduates Entering the Workforce

To successfully navigate this transition, recent graduates should embrace continuous learning. The learning doesn’t stop after graduation. Staying updated with industry trends, new materials and emerging technologies is crucial. Master 3D modeling programs like Rhino, and become proficient with rendering programs such as Enscape. Be adept at transitioning between 3D and 2D, and understand how to create drawings with proper layouts, line weights and hatches. Feel confident working seamlessly across different software, effortlessly transitioning from one to the next. If this isn’t you yet, don’t worry. When I first graduated, I certainly hadn’t mastered any programs either. However, after asking hundreds of questions and being immersed in a fast-paced workplace surrounded by experienced and talented colleagues, I quickly improved. You truly learn the most about the industry and refine your skills once you enter the workforce. Most offices are more interested in your thought process and design thinking rather than how proficient you are with specific software.

Developing strong communication skills is also vital. Effective communication with clients, team members, and stakeholders is crucial. You’ll be given plenty of opportunity to practice clear and concise verbal and written communication to convey ideas and resolve issues efficiently. I was always told there is no such thing as a stupid question or a bad idea. Share your thoughts and communicate your ideas, allowing yourself to be heard. Remember, nobody is perfect and nobody knows everything. If someone doesn’t listen or give your idea the attention it deserves, take pride in knowing that you made a meaningful contribution. Don’t let anyone undermine your abilities, because with dedication, everything can be learned. I truly believe that everyone possesses unique talents and can contribute something special to their team and their project.


Things You’ll Learn on the Job

Everyone should have their own opinion, voice and the ability to share their ideas. However, being open to feedback and criticism is a valuable tool for growth. The architecture profession involves constant collaboration, dialogue and feedback on a daily basis. Learn to accept feedback gracefully and use it to improve your skills and designs. Additionally, cultivating patience and resilience is necessary to navigate setbacks and challenges. Stay focused on your long-term goals, as building skills and creating a strong portfolio of projects requires time and considerable, consistent effort.

While on the job, you’ll learn how to juggle multiple tasks. When you first enter an office, you’ll likely learn how to manage multiple aspects of a project simultaneously, such as creating 3D models, 2D drawings, renderings, and physical models. You’ll also begin to gain hands-on experience with construction methods, materials, and technologies, understanding that the practical aspects of building is crucial for successful project execution. As you gain this experience, working with a diverse range of people in various roles, you’ll start to develop a better understanding of real-world project management, including effective coordination with stakeholders and managing project timelines and budgets.

One of the most important things I had to learn is how to be efficient with my time. It is crucial for meeting deadlines and balancing all the tasks you need to complete over the days, weeks, and project timelines. While project managers will do their best to oversee the projects and manage the team’s time, in my experience, especially when they handle multiple projects simultaneously, it’s beneficial to develop your own strategies to stay organized and manage your workload effectively.


You Are a Problem Solver

Despite its challenges and the critical, subjective nature of the field, architecture has a beautiful aspect: the daily opportunity to solve problems. We constantly strive to address design issues and develop creative solutions, making real-time problem-solving a routine part of our work. Every day, you’ll go into work with one or more problems to solve, and by the end of the day, you’ll have learned how to address those challenges – this is how architects and designers grow. On-the-job challenges require quick thinking and effective problem-solving. You’ll learn to address issues promptly and find practical solutions. But don’t worry, you’ll never be alone. You’ll always have a supportive team behind you to help figure things out. As I mentioned earlier, you don’t need to know all the answers, and no one does.

One significant lesson I’ve learned is the vital importance of paying attention to detail in both your work and the architectural practice overall. Developing a keen eye for detail in every aspect of your work, starting with the thoughtful details you incorporate during the project’s conceptual phase, will set you apart. Through collaborating with many talented designers, I’ve come to appreciate that nothing escapes notice; architects are typically very detail oriented, and the beauty of a design often lies in the meticulousness invested in it.


One More Word of Advice…

The transition from architecture school to professional practice is a significant step that brings new responsibilities and opportunities for growth. My best advice is to approach it with an open mind, fearlessness, and a positive attitude. In school, I considered myself at the top of my class. However, when I started my first internship, I quickly realized I was at the bottom. Everyone around me had significantly more knowledge and experience, both in soft skills and hard skills. But, little by little, and hundreds of questions later, you learn from others — there is only room for improvement.

By understanding the differences between academic and professional environments and embracing the learning curve, I do believe that all recent graduates will be able to navigate this transition successfully. Whether you choose to pursue architecture for life or use it as a stepping stone to explore other related or unrelated fields, with the right mindset and preparation, you’ll be well-equipped to thrive in any dynamic and rewarding career path you choose.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

The post From Studio to Site: Navigating the Transition from Architecture School to Professional Practice appeared first on Journal.

The Rise and Fall of the Starchitect Olympics Stadium (and What Paris Is Doing Right)

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

With the Paris 2024 Olympics just around the corner, excitement is building up. This time, however, it’s not for the usual reasons (well, at least not for the architecture community). Traditionally, the Olympics have been synonymous with grand, jaw-dropping structures designed to leave a lasting impression on the world stage. After all, with more than 200 nations competing, this is the largest sporting event in the world and hosting it can be both an honor and a challenge for a city.

For the past couple of Olympics, iconic stadiums and ambitious venues have pushed the limits of design and engineering, creating lasting legacies for host cities (a trend that reached its peak during the prime era of “starchitecture” in the 2010s.) Unfortunately, they’ve also pushed the limits of sustainability — or rather, the lack thereof. Many of these structures ended up being “white elephants,” underused and costly to maintain, with significant environmental impacts.

This year, the event is taking a different approach. While there has been a noticeable shift towards more sustainable practices so far, Paris 2024 is pushing these efforts further than ever before, aiming to align with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. To do so, the 2024 Olympics focuses on using existing venues, reducing environmental impact and creating long-term benefits for the local community. But how did we (finally) get here?


The Evolution of Olympic Architecture

Before starchitecture made its mark, Olympic venues in the 20th century were more functional than spectacular. These structures were built primarily to accommodate the events and athletes, with little thought given to their post-games use or iconic status. The focus was on practicality and utility rather than making an architectural statement.

undefined

Messapi, cropped by Blackcat, Stadio Olimpico 2024, CC BY-SA 4.0

For example, the 1960 Rome Olympics featured venues like the Stadio Olimpico, which was originally built for football and expanded for the Olympics, ensuring it had a continued purpose after The Games. Similarly, the 1972 Munich Olympics left a significant legacy with its Olympic Park, which has continued to be used for various sports and public events.


The Olympic Games in the Era of Starchitecture

With the advent of postmodernism in the late 20th century, the architecture industry began to embrace bold, eclectic designs that often prioritized form over function. This shift was marked by the rise of “starchitecture”— a trend where high-profile architects designed iconic, statement-making buildings. Naturally, this movement found a perfect stage in the Olympic Games, where host cities aimed to showcase their cultural and economic ambitions.

Think of the 2008 Beijing Olympics with the iconic Bird’s Nest stadium designed by Herzog & de Meuron. This stadium, with its intricate steel lattice structure, symbolized China’s growing economic and architectural ambition. While initially celebrated, the Bird’s Nest has since struggled with post-Olympic usage, often criticized for its high maintenance costs and underutilization.

The aftermath wasn’t much different for the 2012 Games in London, particularly for some of the new venues. While Populous designed the main stadium with sustainability and future use in mind, it still faced challenges in finding consistent use and financial stability. The stadium had a hard time justifying its costs despite being built with a legacy plan.

On the other hand, the Aquatics Centre, designed by Zaha Hadid, stands out as a success story. Unlike many other Olympic structures, the Aquatics Centre was a much-needed facility that has continued to thrive post-Games.

This unfortunate trend continued into the 2016 Rio Olympics, where numerous venues faced severe maintenance issues and underutilization. The infrastructure left behind became a burden rather than a benefit, leading to criticism of the sustainability and planning of these grand projects.

Moreover, these issues aren’t exclusive to the Summer Olympics. Winter Games venues have also faced similar problems. Sochi 2014, for example, saw its sprawling Olympic Park and facilities underused post-games.

So, by the time the 2020 Tokyo Olympics were being planned, public sentiment had shifted significantly against extravagant Olympic architecture. Zaha Hadid’s initial design for the Tokyo 2020 stadium faced public outcry due to its enormous cost and scale, leading to its replacement by Kengo Kuma’s more modest and environmentally conscious design. Kuma’s stadium emphasized natural materials and integration with the surrounding environment, reflecting a broader shift towards sustainable architecture.


Paris 2024: A New Paradigm

This stroll down Olympics memory lane makes it clear that the days of sensational architecture and impractical grandiosity should no longer be the norm.

Cue to today. The 2024 Olympics were promised to be the most sustainable ones yet. So what exactly is making the Paris Olympics different?

1. Reusing Iconic Venues

Paris 2024 is setting a new standard by extensively using existing venues, minimizing construction costs and, as a result, reducing environmental impact. This approach not only saves resources but also prevents the creation of underutilized structures after the event, which was clearly a common issue in past Olympics.

One prime example is the Stade de France, built for the 1998 FIFA World Cup. This stadium will host the athletics events and ceremonies, showcasing how repurposing existing infrastructure can be both efficient and environmentally friendly. Another notable venue is the Roland-Garros Stadium, famous for hosting the French Open, which will be used for tennis and boxing events. By leveraging these iconic sites, Paris ensures that these structures remain integral parts of the city’s sporting landscape long after the Games conclude.

The use of existing venues extends beyond Paris itself. For events taking place outside the city, venues like Bordeaux Stadium (designed by Herzog & de Meuron) and Vélodrome Stadium (by SCAU architecture) will be utilized.

2. Utilizing Cultural and Historic Sites

Beyond sports venues, Paris 2024 is utilizing several cultural and historic sites, incorporating the city’s rich heritage with the grandeur of the Olympics. The temporary Champ de Mars Arena, located in the park between the Eiffel Tower and the École Militaire, will host judo, wrestling and beach volleyball competitions, providing a stunning backdrop for both competitors and spectators. (After all, are you even competing in Paris if the Eiffel Tower isn’t in the background to witness it?)

Other iconic sites include the Grand Palais (set to host fencing and taekwondo) and the Château de Versailles (where equestrian and modern pentathlon events will take place). These choices reflect Paris’s commitment to integrating the Olympics into the city’s existing urban and cultural fabric, rather than building new, potentially (or, more often than not, completely) redundant structures.

3. New Future-Ready Projects

Aquatics Center Paris 2024 by VenhoevenCS and Ateliers 2/3/4, Saint-Denis, France

Aquatics Center Paris 2024 by VenhoevenCS and Ateliers 2/3/4, Saint-Denis, France

Only one new sports venue is being built for Paris 2024 — the Aquatics Center designed by VenhoevenCS and Ateliers 2/3/4/. This building will host water polo, diving and synchronized swimming events during the Olympics. After the Games, it will serve as a community sports center.

Utilizing 90% renewable or recovered energy, the center’s solar roof is one of the largest solar farms in France, covering 25% of its electricity needs. An efficient water system reduces the need for freshwater, reusing 50% of the remaining water while guaranteeing clean water for all purposes. Emphasizing upcycling, the design includes furniture made from wood waste and tribune chairs crafted from 100% recycled plastic collected from local schools.

The building will be surrounded by abundant vegetation, creating a livable and healthy district for the people of Saint-Denis. Over one hundred trees will be planted to improve air quality, stimulate biodiversity and create new ecological connections.

MIXED BUILDING ATHLETES VILLAGE by DREAM, Saint-Ouen-sur-Seine, France

MIXED BUILDING ATHLETES VILLAGE by DREAM, Saint-Ouen-sur-Seine, France

Another standout development is the Olympic and Paralympic Village, designed to transform into a vibrant, fully-fledged city district by 2025. Unlike previous Olympic villages that often became underutilized post-Games, this village will feature more than 2,500 new homes, a student residence, a hotel and extensive office spaces, emphasizing sustainability with its high carbon storage performance and renewable energy sources.

The design also aims to engage the local community with a rooftop gymnasium, extensive green space and a Food Court that extends the public space and encourages social interactions among residents. A pedestrian bridge will connect the public spaces around Stade de France with the Aquatic Center and the new heart of the future eco-neighborhood of La Plaine Saulnier, ensuring connectivity and accessibility.

4. City-Wide Sustainability Initiatives

Paris 2024’s commitment to sustainability extends beyond the venues. The city has undertaken several initiatives to ensure the greenest Olympics yet. These include creating 250 miles of new bike lanes, extending the Métro network and, perhaps most famously, cleaning up the Seine River. Moreover, 300,000 new trees have been planted to strengthen the urban biodiversity.


A Blueprint for the Future

Paris 2024 is not just setting a new standard for the Olympics, but rather offering a blueprint for future global events. By prioritizing sustainability, reusing existing structures and integrating the Games into the existing urban fabric of the city, Paris is showing the world how to host a major event responsibly.

As we look forward to the start of the Olympics, there’s hope these strategies will not only ensure a successful event but also leave a lasting positive impact on the city and its residents. Paris is proving that it is possible to honor the grandeur of the event while embracing sustainability and community-focused planning.

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

The post The Rise and Fall of the Starchitect Olympics Stadium (and What Paris Is Doing Right) appeared first on Journal.

Ode to Joy: 3 Steps Architects Can Take To Make Buildings Less Boring

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The word “boring” is powerful and often viewed as negative, especially within any creative field, including architecture. No architect would ever want to hear, ‘Well done, you made a very boring building.’ Yet, Thomas Heatherwick critiques the architectural profession as having entered a ‘pandemic of boringness.’ The British designer has been associated with this particular word since he gave a TED talk in 2022 titled “The rise of boring architecture — and the case for radically human buildings.”

In 2023, he launched his campaign “Humanise,” delving into why architects make boring buildings (and have for the past 100 years).  He talks about the consequences and the impact of modernism; he calls Le Corbusier the “king of boring” and argues that to re-humanize our buildings, we must focus on emotion. Additionally, one key observation is that Heatherwick rarely deploys popular catchphrases like “environmental sustainability” or “social housing,” which are often used to initiate discussions about the current state of our built environment. Instead, he highlights a broader issue that goes beyond function, operation and construction, advocating for a change in design philosophy.

He suggests three shifts in thinking:

  1. Emotion as a function. Accepting how people feel about a building is critical to its function.
  2. 1000 year thinking. Design buildings with the hope and expectation that they will last 1,000 years.
  3. Prioritize door distance. Concentrate on a building’s interesting qualities at the 6-5-foot (2-metre) door distance.

Little Island by Heatherwick Studio, New York City, New York | Jury Winner, 11th Annual A+Awards, Public Parks & Green Spaces

Through the “Humanise” campaign, Heatherwick is also developing a master’s degree at Loughborough University, set to start in autumn 2025. The course will allegedly challenge traditional architectural education and the over-specialization practices currently fostered by universities.

Still, Heatherwick’s approach and argumentation is — apart from refreshing — quite provocative. It opens up questions such as how can one make architecture less boring? Is it purely a matter of form and texture? How is “boring” even measured? And finally, is emotion the key to battle this endless array of glass façades and monolithic volumes?

The rest of the article sets up a series of speculative scenarios that have nothing to do with architectural form. In contrast, they are “joyful” suggestion that could perhaps, in a different universe, motivate not only architects but also non-architects, developers and even educational institutions to find their own interpretation of what a non-boring spatial environment is.


Introducing “Emocurrency”

Lantern House by Heatherwick Studio, New York City, New York

As Pat Fin’s article “Humanize”: Thomas Heatherwick’s Crusade Against Boring Architecture outlines, Heatherwick identifies money, education and the lack of community involvement as the three pillars of boringness. Developers hide behind the modernist movement’s philosophy ‘form follows function’ to defend their decisions for budget cuts that lead to repetitive, dull structures. However, what would happen if a space’s emotional impact could become quantifiable and better yet, profitable?

In truth, to inhabit or experience restaurants, cultural buildings, residences, hotels, offices etc. people have to pay; and usually, the price of a ticket or a restaurant bill and even rent is determined by the quality of function experienced by the user. How many bedrooms is the flat? How spacious and luxurious was the museum lobby? How comfortable were the restaurant seats? Still, what if instead of seeing value only in function, developers were making profit through the strategy of emocurrency (i.e. emotional currency) by investing on emo-tokens generated by all these feedback smiley buttons pressed daily in millions of spaces around the world?


Introducing “The RIBA Plan of Joy”

Maggie’s Leeds by Heatherwick Studio, Leeds, United Kingdom Photo by Hufton+Crow Photography Jury and Popular Choice Winner, 9th Annual A+Awards, Hospitals + Healthcare Centers 

Most architects are familiar with the RIBA Plan of Works, a document that describes in detail the process of briefing, designing, constructing and operating building projects, outlining the tasks and information that needs to be delivered for a successful outcome. In other words, it is a very difficult document to digest for creative architects.

However, instead of instructions, The RIBA Plan of Joy will include a series of text prompts designed to encourage architects to think beyond the conventional constraints. Questions and scenarios will challenge them to explore new ideas and reimagine the possibilities of their projects instead of providing dry, operational guidelines. Furthermore, the document will also include a dictionary, outlining common terms used in architectural discourse, offering multiple interpretations and definitions. Finally, the RIBA Plan of Works will be written in two formats: the classic “architectural jargon” as Heatherwick calls it, as well as in simpler non-architecture words, making it accessible to the wider population.


Introducing the “Do not Touch” Initiative

1000 Trees Phase 1 by Heatherwick Studio, Shanghai, China Jury and Popular Choice Winner, 11th Annual A+Awards, Shopping Center

In the past decades, mass production has eliminated architectural detailing to such an extent that architects no longer have the time to design joints or handrails, but rather produce countless window schedules and lists of prefabricated assembly parts. Inspired by Heatherwick’s “Prioritise door distance” design direction, the “Do not Touch” initiative encourages pedestrians to touch, hold and experience the texture of buildings. Smudges on glass are welcome (even encouraged), while the turning of a doorknob becomes one of the most experiential moments upon entering a building. This initiative aims to reintroduce craft into construction, remodel architects into makers and add touch to people’s spatial senses.

Featured Image: Zeitz MOCAA by Heatherwick Studio

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The post Ode to Joy: 3 Steps Architects Can Take To Make Buildings Less Boring appeared first on Journal.

Building Bridges With BIM: How Collaborative Design is Revolutionizing 21st Century Architecture

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

In the ever-evolving landscape of modern architecture and construction, the complexity of building projects is escalating, with each decision intricately linked to factors like structural integrity, sustainability, cost efficiency and aesthetic value. This interconnectedness requires strong communication, where choices in materials, design and technology influence the building’s performance, environmental impact and user experience. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to ensure that the built environment meets the diverse needs of contemporary society from an aesthetic, functional and regulatory perspective while anticipating future challenges.

The intricate nature of contemporary building projects is driven by several key factors: the growing emphasis on sustainability necessitates careful material selection and building methods to minimize environmental impact; stricter regulatory requirements demand meticulous compliance, ensuring that projects meet all legal and safety standards; additionally, innovative designs must skillfully balance aesthetics with functionality, creating spaces that are not only visually appealing but also highly practical and efficient.

Place des Arts by Moriyama Teshima Architects and Bélanger Salach Architecture, Sudbury, Canada | Jury Winner, 12th Annual A+Awards, Architecture +Teamwork | This joint venture project between two lead design architects required further collaboration with seven contributing organizations of ROCS (Regroupement des organismes culturels de Sudbury), which needs were merged in the final design and coordinated with Greater Sudbury Downtown Revitalization Masterplan.

Building projects are highly interdependent, prompting decisions made by one stakeholder or discipline to potentially influence the work of others. A collaborative approach ensures that the outcome reflects a harmonious synthesis of diverse expertise and perspectives, ultimately contributing to the project’s success in meeting functional, aesthetic, regulatory and sustainability objectives. For instance, choices made by architects regarding design aesthetics and spatial planning can affect structural engineering considerations, construction methods and regulatory compliance requirements; sustainability consultants’ decisions on green building certifications and energy-efficient strategies can influence design elements, construction materials and operational practices throughout the building’s lifecycle; and engineering decisions on structural integrity and sustainability can impact architectural design possibilities and material selections.

This interplay, which spans many disciplines at many levels, highlights the importance of early and continuous collaboration among stakeholders, including architects, designers, engineers, contractors, clients and regulatory bodies. By involving these parties from the project’s inception, there is a shared understanding and alignment of goals, ensuring that decisions are informed by a comprehensive view of all project requirements and constraints. Not only does this interdisciplinary collaboration enhance decision-making efficiency, but it also allows for the integration of diverse perspectives into a cohesive project conception that optimizes functionality and aesthetic appeal while meeting regulatory standards and sustainability goals.


Elevating Design: The Role of BIM in Interdisciplinary Collaboration

6D Dimensions in BIM

6D BIM. | Chart by Fernando.morales.tosar via Wikimedia Commons.

The key is to create an environment where different team members can interact, challenge and inspire each other, leading to innovative and practical solutions. The diverse expertise and perspectives from interdisciplinary collaboration ensure all angles are considered, creating thorough solutions. The success of such collaboration relies on clear communication to achieve shared goals. While this communication is essential, advanced technologies like Building Information Modeling (BIM) enhance it further, improving project design and construction processes.

BIM revolutionizes the design and construction processes in AEC (Architecture, Engineering and Construction) projects by enhancing collaboration and efficiency. BIM allows stakeholders to work from a unified digital model containing comprehensive project information. This digital representation facilitates real-time updates and seamless interdisciplinary communication.

BIM incorporates multiple dimensions, such as 3D for spatial design, 4D for scheduling, 5D for cost management and 6D for sustainability. These dimensions enable stakeholders to visualize complex designs, detect clashes early, simulate construction sequences, and analyze energy performance. By improving accuracy and optimizing decision-making, BIM ultimately leads to cost savings, faster project delivery and enhanced overall quality in construction projects, making it an indispensable tool in the AEC industry.


Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters

Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters

Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters

Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters by CSWADI, Chengdu, China. | Photo by Arch-Exist (top); site plan and massing diagrams (below).

CSWADI’s Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters in Chengdu, China, showcases excellent interdisciplinary collaboration in AEC projects, boosted by technologies like BIM. This collaborative approach marks the Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters as a landmark in architectural innovation and sustainable urban development.

The Green Module: Lakeside Headquarters showcases a dynamic collaboration between the US and China, setting a new standard for Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB) in areas with extreme climates. As the headquarters of a leading design firm, it integrates into its surroundings, reimagining regional architecture through modular spaces. The project achieves a harmonious blend of form, space, and energy efficiency by combining passive strategies, active technologies, and renewable energy with innovative materials. Recognized with the 2022 Active House Award in China, it holds certifications for Net Zero Energy Consumption and Carbon Neutrality.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) and cross-disciplinary collaboration were vital, ensuring comprehensive design considerations and efficient execution. This synergy optimized the integration of advanced materials and systems, such as photovoltaic energy storage direct current flexibility system, natural ventilation and pre-cooling ventilation, triple silver double hollow insulated glass, vertical greening intelligent drip irrigation system, as well as temperature and humidity sub-control technology. BIM’s influence extended through the entire project lifecycle, enhancing project management, elevating design quality, and boosting the efficiency of construction and operations.


From Design to Construction: Harnessing BIM for Smarter Building Projects

Building Information Modeling (BIM) plays a crucial role in modern building projects by promoting teamwork across different disciplines and improving efficiency in the AEC industry. BIM integrates various aspects of project management — from design and scheduling to cost control and sustainability — allowing teams to handle complex building challenges with accuracy and foresight. This technology enhances communication and collaboration, enabling teams to innovate and create smarter, more sustainable buildings that meet strict regulations and societal demands. As the industry advances, BIM continues to drive improvements that enhance project outcomes and contribute to a more resilient built environment.

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

The post Building Bridges With BIM: How Collaborative Design is Revolutionizing 21st Century Architecture appeared first on Journal.

Iterating for Iteration’s Sake: Rethinking the Purpose and Process in Architecture and Design

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

In the world of architecture, the iterative process is often hailed as a crucial phase of design development. This method, characterized by repeated cycles of trial and error, is intended to refine and perfect architectural concepts. However, there is a growing concern within the industry that iteration can sometimes become an end in itself rather than a means to an end. Architects might find themselves exhausting every possible option before choosing the final design, a practice that can have significant implications for employees and the overall culture of an office.

Is it truly necessary to exhaust every possible person, shape, angle, direction, size and color just to demonstrate that adequate effort has been put into a project?


The Iterative Process: A Double-Edged Sword?

Iteration is undeniably a valuable tool in the architect’s toolkit. By exploring multiple design options, architects can uncover innovative solutions and push the boundaries of conventional design. This process allows for the refinement of ideas, leading to more robust and thoughtful outcomes. However, when the focus shifts to iterating for the sake of iteration, it can lead to a cycle of endless revisions that may not necessarily contribute to the overall quality or integrity of the final design.

In many architectural firms, the pressure to explore every conceivable option before settling on a design can create a taxing work environment. Employees may feel overwhelmed by the relentless demand for new iterations, especially when many ideas are overlooked and not thoroughly discussed. This constant cycle can lead to frustration and a sense of futility in the creative process. The iterative process, when not managed effectively, can create a culture of overwork and stress, where the quantity of designs takes precedence over the quality.


The Culture of Iteration

The culture of iteration in an architectural office can significantly influence the work atmosphere and the morale of the team. While a rigorous iterative process can foster creativity and innovation, it can also create a sense of endless pursuit without clear direction. Employees might find themselves questioning the purpose of their efforts, particularly if they feel that their iterations are being produced merely to satisfy the demands of the process rather than to achieve a meaningful design goal.

To foster a healthy and productive work culture, I believe that it is essential for firms to strike a balance between iteration and intentionality. Architects must be encouraged to iterate with purpose, ensuring that each version of a design brings them closer to a coherent and well-thought-out final product. This approach not only enhances the quality of the design but also instills a sense of purpose and direction among employees, contributing to a more positive and motivating work environment.


Intentional Design: The Power of Purpose

Greenpoint Landing by OMA, New York City, New York

Intentional design is the antidote to the pitfalls of excessive iteration. At its core, intentional design is about making deliberate choices that are grounded in a clear understanding of the project’s goals, context, and narrative. It involves creating buildings that are not just visually appealing but also meaningful and functional. Each design decision is informed by a story, a concept, or a purpose, ensuring that the final product is more than just an arbitrary collection of shapes and forms.

I’ve often found myself in a predicament where I’m instructed to design a form for a program, client, or purpose that remains largely undefined. Once I craft a shape, based on what seems most suitable for the site conditions, I must then force the program into this form – and that’s where the issues start. We become obsessed with the form itself, rather than considering if it truly serves the project’s best interests.

Architects who embrace intentional design are more likely to produce buildings that resonate with their users and the broader community. From my experience, I have found that most architects claim their designs have meaning and purpose, but is that really always the case? Buildings should tell a story and offer a unique experience, making them stand out in a crowded architectural landscape. By focusing on the purpose and meaning behind each design element, architects can create spaces that are not only beautiful but also deeply connected to their context and function. Many designers claim to prioritize both form and function, but in my experience, form has often taken precedence over functionality, which is not a perspective I fundamentally agree with.


The Role of Storytelling in Design

A key component of intentional design is storytelling. The most compelling architectural designs often evolve from a narrative that guides the development of the project. This narrative can be rooted in the history of the site, the cultural context, or the needs and aspirations of the users. By weaving a story into the design process, architects can ensure that their buildings are grounded in a meaningful context, making them more relatable and engaging.

For example, a building designed to serve as a community center might draw inspiration from the local history and culture, incorporating elements that reflect the community’s identity and heritage. This approach not only enhances the building’s aesthetic appeal but also fosters a sense of ownership and pride among the users. The design becomes a reflection of the community’s values and aspirations, creating a deeper connection between the building and its users.


Rethinking the Iterative Process

The Couch by MVRDV, IJburg, Netherlands | Beginning with a simple cuboid, the volume is manipulated to provide views for spectators across the court and the wider region while maintaining space within the structure to house changing rooms.

The iterative process is a powerful tool in architectural design, but it should be used wisely. When iteration becomes an end in itself, it can lead to a cycle of endless revisions that detract from the quality and purpose of the final design. To avoid this pitfall, architects and designers should embrace intentional design, ensuring that each iteration is guided by a clear purpose and meaning. This doesn’t mean you can’t be playful and experiment with different designs and strategies. However, when this phase extends too long and people produce dozens of designs that ultimately aren’t considered or discussed in design meetings, it can be quite disheartening.

By focusing on intentionality and storytelling, architects can create buildings that are not only visually stunning but also deeply meaningful and functional. This approach fosters a more positive and motivating work culture, where employees are inspired by the purpose behind their efforts. Ultimately, intentional design leads to better buildings that enrich the lives of their users and contribute to the vitality of their communities.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

Top image: Greenpoint Landing by OMA, New York City, New York

The post Iterating for Iteration’s Sake: Rethinking the Purpose and Process in Architecture and Design appeared first on Journal.