Entradas

The Complicated Case of Polykatoikia, Athens’ Famous Postwar Apartment Blocks

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

Homogenous. Boring. Bulky. Ugly.

These are some of the characterizations Athenians use to describe the buildings in which they live. The famous polykatoikia is a multi-housing apartment block whose name derives from poly, meaning many, and katoikia, meaning residence. This dominant morphological form has shaped Athens’ architectural identity since the early 20th century.

In 1933, a group of architects, theoreticians and artists boarded the ship Patris II to travel from Marseille to Athens to carry out the CIAM IV Conference (Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne) titled “the Functional City”. Le Corbusier (architect), Fernand Léger (artist), Christian Zervos (art critic) and Siegfried Giedion (architectural historian) irreversibly shaped the future of Athens’s built environment by advocating and promoting the modernist movement, thus inspiring Greek architects to produce the first designs of the Athenian Polykatoikia.

Until the 1950s, polykatoikias slowly overshadowed the many two-story neoclassical houses that stood as the predominant form of residence throughout the city. However, in the late 1950s, following the devastating losses of the Second World War and the Greek Civil War, large parts of the population were leaving the countryside to migrate to the country’s capital in search of a better life. Consequently, the need for housing in Athens grew exponentially, and a new law, antiparochi, was created that changed the trajectory of the city’s urban layout forever. The law of antiparochi allowed landowners to exchange their plots for ownership of some of the apartments in the new polykatoikia constructed on their land, resulting in the erection of countless polykatoikia buildings in record time.

The positive effects of antiparochi were that the people from the countryside managed to find not only homes but also jobs in the construction industry. However, throughout the polykatoikia bloom, which mostly took place during the 1950s through to the 1980s, most of the buildings were not designed and materialized by architects but rather by contractors, who would relentlessly copy the basic morphological features, leading to the production of many uninspiring, identical multi-housing units. As a result only a few architectural “gems” can be found in a sea of repetitive concrete blocks. Furthermore, due to the rapid construction, any attempt for proper urban planning practices could simply not keep up and, as a result, polykatoikias were above the control of building regulations and often situated in areas without any proper infrastructure.

If a person asks a present-day Athenian whether they find their city beautiful, the most likely response would be “No.” The aspiration of an Athens filled with neoclassical buildings, which was initially brought to the city by western European philhellenes, is a recurring 21st century dream. Nevertheless, this was not the case for the 1950s “modern” housewife. The polykatoikia introduced a functional way of living, filled with new amenities that were unprecedented at that time. People who lived in neoclassical houses had no immediate access to water, no preinstalled heating system and often had to go outside to use the bathroom facilities. The carefully decorated and carved façades, although beautiful and somewhat reminiscent of the (glorious) ancient Greek past, did not satisfy the needs of the 20th century Athenian.

Furthermore, the polykatoikia introduced a new social organization. For the first time in history, wealthy and poor were living in the same building and neighborhood. In a typical polykatoikia, the ground floor would most likely be a shop, a café, a restaurant or a bar, then the first couple of floors would be occupied by the lower social classes while the upper floors would house wealthier families; in fact, in later years some apartments would be turned into workspaces and, more recently, Airbnbs. This groundbreaking and totally spontaneous functional and social organization resulted in a city that seams homogenous but is actually the complete opposite: it is a vibrant built environment that truly never sleeps.

Still, almost 50 years have passed since the glorious days of the polykatoikia and it is time to reflect once more. Athens is currently facing an array of predominantly environmental problems, where a concrete “carpet” has covered entirely the natural landscape of the Attica basin. Amidst the concrete there are almost no green spaces, the existing rivers flow underground and Athens has become the hottest city in Europe. Fortunately, the “mix” of social classes has been preserved however, the growing tourist waves and golden visa initiatives are threatening housing for the four-million Athenians, who continue to live in polykatoikias in need of urgent restoration in both their interior and exterior.

So, what happens next? In a city that has been dominated by such a strong architectural typology, how can contemporary architects push this identity forward, tackling present-day challenges while preserving all the positive aspects of the polykatoikia? Projects with green balconies and roofs, sustainable cladding materials and designs that strive for an A+ ranking in energy efficiency are slowly improving the urban fabric. Some architects also claim that certain demolition works are unavoidable to free up space for planting and public use. Throughout this article, the actual architecture of the polykatoikia is not discussed but rather its wider social, political, economic and environmental implications. True, its simple, clean, modernist form is perhaps what allowed it to multiply in such a fast pace. Still, the most important initiative for architects would be to collectively research, gather and respond to the 2024 needs of the Greek capital and I am positive that the evolution of the Athenian architectural identity will follow.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

Top image: MarylinalcyonovaBuilding Density beneath Lycabettus Hill in Athens Greece 01CC BY-SA 4.0

The post The Complicated Case of Polykatoikia, Athens’ Famous Postwar Apartment Blocks appeared first on Journal.

Hacking the Human Habitat: How Cyborg Architecture Blends Biology with Technology

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of architecture, a new frontier is emerging: cyborg architecture. This innovative approach blends biological and technological elements, creating spaces that are not only adaptive and intelligent but also deeply integrated with the human experience. It’s a dialogue between the digital and physical worlds that blurs the boundaries between human and machine environments. Cyborg architecture envisions a future where buildings are dynamic, responsive and symbiotic with their occupants. As technology continues to advance, cyborg architecture will play a pivotal role in shaping the cities of tomorrow, offering solutions that enhance the human experience while promoting sustainability and resilience. Let’s explore how cyborg architecture weaves together technology, sustainability and human interaction to create innovative, future-forward environments.


Responsive Environments

Al Bahr Towers, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates by AHR

Al Bahr Towers, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates by AHR

Al Bahr Towers by AHR, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Cyborg architecture is an emerging field that intertwines with several forward-thinking design approaches, creating dynamic, responsive and future-ready built environments. Responsive environments are central to cyborg architecture, where buildings and spaces dynamically adapt to the real-time needs and actions of their inhabitants. At its heart lies the principle of responsiveness. These spaces utilize advanced sensors and actuators to monitor and adapt to the needs of their occupants in real-time. For instance, a building might adjust its lighting and temperature based on the number of people present and their activities, ensuring optimal comfort and energy efficiency.

This level of adaptability transforms spaces into living entities that can anticipate and respond to human behavior. Projects like the Al Bahr Towers in Abu Dhabi, designed by Aedas, features a dynamic façade with an automated sunshade system that opens and closes in response to sunlight, reducing energy consumption and enhancing comfort. The use of such responsive façades that adjust according to environmental conditions, illustrates how cyborg architecture creates spaces that react to their surroundings and users.

Responsive environments also extend to the physical layout of spaces. Walls and furniture can be designed to move and reconfigure themselves according to the specific needs of the moment, creating a flexible and versatile environment. This adaptability is particularly valuable in urban settings where space is limited and multi-functionality is essential.


Biomimetic Design

Norfolk, Burleigh Heads Burleigh Heads, Australia by KOICHI TAKADA ARCHITECTS

Norfolk, Burleigh Heads Burleigh Heads, Australia by KOICHI TAKADA ARCHITECTS

Norfolk, Burleigh Heads by KOICHI TAKADA ARCHITECTS, Burleigh Heads, Australia

Biomimicry in architecture draws inspiration from nature’s processes and systems. Biomimetic design therefore draws inspiration from the natural world to create architectural solutions that are efficient, sustainable and resilient. In cyborg architecture, this involves using materials and structures that mimic the properties of living organisms.

The Norfolk Burleigh Heads project, designed by Koichi Takada Architects, is a strong example of this, with the building drawing inspiration from the local Norfolk pine trees, particularly their pinecones, which protect seeds from the elements while opening up in optimal conditions. The building’s design draws from natural principles, featuring overlapping balcony slabs that offer both protection from harsh weather and the option to embrace openness and natural light. Adjustable timber screens, inspired by the adaptability of pinecones, give residents the ability to control their environment—shielding from the elements or opening up to enjoy the subtropical climate and ocean views. These organic forms and materials integrate with the coastal landscape, creating a space that is both dynamic and in harmony with nature.

Another biomimetic approach involves designing buildings that can adapt to environmental conditions, similar to how organisms evolve to survive in their habitats. Facades that change color or texture in response to temperature and sunlight can regulate indoor climate and reduce energy consumption, creating a more sustainable built environment.


Human-Machine Interfaces

The Edge, Amsterdam, Netherlands by PLP Architecture

The Edge, Amsterdam, Netherlands by PLP Architecture

The Edge by PLP Architecture, Amsterdam, Netherlands

One of the most futuristic, but central aspects of cyborg architecture is the integration of human-machine interfaces (HMIs). These interfaces enable seamless interaction between occupants and their environments through intuitive controls such as voice commands, gestures, and even neural inputs. Imagine walking into a room that instantly recognizes your preferences for lighting, music and temperature, adjusting them to suit your mood and activities. This is evident in projects like The Edge in Amsterdam, which integrates advanced sensors, data analytics and personalized apps to enhance user experience within the building. Cyborg architecture leverages HMI technology to blur the line between user and structure, creating environments that are not only adaptive but also anticipatory of human needs.

Neural interfaces represent a groundbreaking advancement in HMIs, allowing for direct communication between the human brain and the building’s systems. This technology can transform accessibility, enabling individuals with disabilities to control their environments effortlessly. As neural interface technology continues to develop, the potential for creating truly personalized and immersive experiences within architectural spaces grows exponentially.


Living Architecture

Hy-Fi, Queens, New York, NY, United States by The Living

Hy-Fi, Queens, New York, NY, United States by The Living

Hy-Fi by The Living, New York City, New York

The concept of living architecture — where buildings behave like living organisms — takes this a step further. Projects like The Living’s Hy-Fi Tower in New York, made from organic, compostable materials, highlight how cyborg architecture can create living, breathing structures.  Such designs features bio-bricks made from mycelium (fungus), showing how buildings can grow and decompose like natural organisms and evolve in real-time. They can change based on environmental inputs, effectively merging biological and architectural processes.

The concept of living architecture, where buildings incorporate living organisms as part of their design can include elements such as green roofs and vertical gardens that enhance biodiversity and improve air quality. More advanced applications involve bioengineered materials that can grow and adapt over time, creating a dynamic and evolving architectural form.


Futuristic Applications

Futuristic architecture often envisions smart, technology-integrated environments that respond to modern urban challenges. The applications of cyborg architecture extend beyond individual buildings to encompass entire smart cities. In these urban environments, buildings and infrastructure communicate and collaborate to optimize resources, reduce waste and enhance the quality of life for residents. For example, traffic systems can adjust in real-time to minimize congestion, while public spaces adapt to accommodate events and changing social dynamics.

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies further enrich the experience of cyborg architecture. By overlaying digital information onto physical spaces, AR can transform navigation, education and entertainment within buildings. Imagine walking through a museum where historical artifacts come to life through interactive displays, or navigating a complex building using AR-guided directions.

Biofeedback systems also represent another cutting-edge application, where buildings monitor the health and well-being of occupants through sensors that track vital signs. These systems can adjust environmental conditions to promote relaxation, focus, or recovery, creating environments that actively support human health.


Challenges and Considerations

While cyborg architecture offers exciting possibilities, it also presents significant challenges and considerations. Privacy and security are paramount concerns as buildings become more connected and data-driven. Ensuring that personal information remains secure and that occupants have control over their environments is essential to maintaining trust in these advanced systems.

Ethical considerations also arise regarding the extent to which environments should influence human behavior. The potential for technology to subtly shape interactions and experiences raises questions about autonomy and the balance between convenience and control. Sustainability is another critical factor, as the integration of advanced technologies must be balanced with energy efficiency and environmental impact. Cyborg architecture must strive to create buildings that are not only intelligent but also environmentally responsible.

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

The post Hacking the Human Habitat: How Cyborg Architecture Blends Biology with Technology appeared first on Journal.

“Frameless”: The Architecture of Immersive Art Experiences

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

Frameless” is the UK’s largest permanent multi-sensory art experience. In 1928, the Regal, one of the country’s most renowned cinemas, opened in Marble Arch in central London. Following WWII, the building reopened as Odeon movie theatre and in 2016, it became a mixed-use residential development with a very large (and empty) basement, initially intended to be converted yet into another cinema. Instead, the space was eventually transformed into four galleries, showcasing some of the world’s greatest works of art in the most innovative and immersive way possible.

Visitors experience the works of Dali, Monet, Kandinsky and van Gogh literally from the inside: they are not mere observers but rather stand within the art that envelops them, able to see, experience, and to some extent interact with the paintings’ tiniest details, while listening to carefully crafted soundscapes. The four galleries, Beyond Reality, Color in Motion, the World Around Us and the Art of Abstraction, recreate, through a series of projections, famous paintings from surrealism to impressionism and abstraction, and redefine what a traditional art gallery should be.

As an architect, I can’t help but wonder what sort of construction expertise and technology was required in order to materialize such complicated and large scale project. According to project manager James Griffiths, construction commenced in October 2021 and was completed in the impressive timeframe of only nine months. The three primary design principles of the project included: constructing a “narrative of materials”, having as little environmental impact as possible and operating “Frameless” with renewable energy.

According to project architect Angus Pond, different bases such as stone, metal, glass and fabrics were used to ‘create an environment that combines utilitarian functionality with a sense of glamor and even theatrical overtones.’ In parallel, the construction team found innovative techniques to reuse as much of the materials found on site and eventually power the venue by using 93% renewable energy. After the interior shell of the space was constructed, an impressive amount fifty 3-Chip DPL laser projectors were installed, delivering 479 million pixels and 1 million lumens of brightness and vivid colors, clearly depicting every brushstroke and splash of paint, and were complimented by 158 loudspeakers that emanated 360-degree surround sound.

Similarly to how artists throughout the centuries sought to bring their dreams, nightmares and myths into reality, “frameless” is a type of architecture that merges spatial technology, design and construction in order to transport the people living in reality to imaginary worlds. The project is an example of immersive architecture, proving that even though there is an array of implementation challenges, it is not impossible to create real-world “phygital” (physical and digital) environments.

Immersive architecture is most likely found in art and exhibition as well as entertainment venues, retail and commercial stores and public spaces, and has gradually become an integral part of the discipline, where carefully curated imagery, light, sounds and textures create impactful experiences that surpass traditional spatial design. Brand flagship stores often integrate interactive displays or creative lighting and acoustic solutions to “connect” the customer with their products. Installations in public spaces react to environmental changes, the time of the day and even to individual users, while performance spaces utilize projectors and surround sound to deliver state-of-the-art experiences.

Still, what is so beneficial about this concept of hybrid reality and immersive architecture? Apart from the fact that spaces will continuously become a lot more personalized to each individual, by adding more “ingredients” to architectural design – such as sound, touch and even smell – space becomes more exciting. It is not by chance that such design methods are primarily used for producing entertainment and storytelling experiences since these uses require a person’s utmost attention in order to be successful.

Nevertheless, they point the way to an architecture that prioritizes emotion over function and creates environments that resonate on a deeper, more intuitive level with those who inhabit them. What if we could then extend this approach to hospitals, schools and even transportation facilities? Ultimately, the benefit of immersive architecture and hybrid reality lies in their ability to humanize spaces, making them more aligned with our emotional and sensory needs.

Architizer is thrilled to announce the world' best architecture firms in 2024, all winners of the 12th Annual A+Awards! Want to get your firm in the running next season? Stay up to date by subscribing to our A+Awards Newsletter. 

Featured image generated by Architizer on Midjourney

The post “Frameless”: The Architecture of Immersive Art Experiences appeared first on Journal.

Emotional Architecture: How Curves and Lines Influence Human Experience

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

When you enter a building, you often immediately sense how it will make you feel. Whether a space feels comfortable and open or claustrophobic and closed off, cold and rigid or organic and fluid, the shapes of spaces — their curves, angles and configurations — play a significant role in their psychological impact and how we perceive them.

Architecture is not just about creating functional spaces; it is about crafting environments that resonate with human emotions and enhance well-being. The shapes and forms used in architecture, particularly curves and lines, play a crucial role in influencing how we feel and behave within a space. By examining studies on shape-induced emotions, exploring examples of therapeutic architecture, and understanding the role of design in user experience, we can appreciate how architecture impacts our emotional and psychological state.


The Psychology of Shapes in Architecture

Karen Blixens Plads Copenhagen, Denmark by Cobe

Karen Blixens Plads, Copenhagen, Denmark by Cobe

The human brain responds instinctively to different shapes and forms, which can evoke various emotional and psychological reactions. Understanding these responses allows architects to design spaces that promote positive experiences and well-being.

Curves and Organic Shapes: Comfort and Connection

Hutong Bubble 218 Beijing, China by MAD Architects

Hutong Bubble 218 Beijing, China by MAD Architects

Hutong Bubble 218 by MAD Architects, Beijing, China

Curved shapes are often associated with comfort, safety, and naturalness. In fact, curves can reduce stress and promote relaxation by actually easing our brains’ threat response. Curves in architecture can mimic organic forms found in nature, like hills, rivers and plants, evoking feelings of calm. Others might perceive curves as facilitating a sense of flow and movement, gently guiding people through a space.

Research in environmental psychology has shown that people tend to prefer spaces with curved elements over those dominated by straight lines. A study by Oshin Vartanian, a professor of perception, cognition and cognitive neuroscience, and colleagues found that participants rated rooms with curved features as more beautiful and pleasant than those with angular designs. The study indicates that when people viewed spaces with curves, the area of the brain associated with emotions and reward was activated, suggesting a sense of safety and positive emotional responses.

I would also categorize spiral shapes alongside curves and circles, as they share the same gentle, flowing qualities. Like other curved forms, spirals are often found in nature and have a unique psychological impact compared to geometric shapes. In architecture, spiral shapes can create a sense of dynamism and fluidity within a space, evoking feelings of movement and transformation. They can symbolize the ongoing cycle of life and evolution, suggesting growth and progress. This is often achieved by incorporating spiral staircases, ramps or curvilinear forms that guide people through a space in an organic, flowing manner. These elements can enhance the experience of a building by encouraging exploration and interaction, reflecting the natural rhythms and patterns found in the world around us.

Lines: Clarity and Structure

Wangbangyo, Ulsan, South Korea by On Architects Inc.

Wangbangyo, Ulsan, South Korea by On Architects Inc.

Wangbangyo by On Architects Inc., Ulsan, South Korea

Straight lines and angles, on the other hand, convey a sense of clarity, order, and structure. They can evoke feelings of stability and strength, which is why they are often used in institutional and commercial architecture. However, excessive use of straight lines can also lead to perceptions of rigidity and coldness. Moshe Bar, an Israeli neuroscientist, conducted studies showing that angular designs activate the brain’s threat perception center. This response may have evolutionary roots, as our brains might perceive sharp angles as potential threats.

While straight lines are associated with efficiency and functionality, they can also create environments that feel impersonal or harsh. In architecture, many people I know tend to gravitate towards designing with straight lines and right angles because they find these forms to be “cleaner” and “easier” to work with. If you move away from using right angles and straight lines, you often find yourself exploring more parametric designs, which are not only more challenging to model and work with, but also more complex to understand and solve from an architectural standpoint.


Somewhere Between

Moliner House, Zaragoza, Spain by Alberto Campo Baeza

Moliner House, Zaragoza, Spain by Alberto Campo Baeza

The integration of curves and lines in architecture goes beyond aesthetics; it shapes how people interact with and experience space. Thoughtful design can enhance user experience by considering the emotional impact of architectural forms. I find this topic fascinating because it applies not only to architecture but also to a wide range of design fields and professional strategies. In my opinion, although research indicates that straight lines and sharp edges in architecture might be associated with increased feelings of stress or perceived threat, this isn’t universally true for all architectural experiences. The impact of shapes on our emotions is nuanced and influenced by a multitude of factors that interact to shape our perception of a space. Some nuances to consider could be:

1. Context and Functionality

In many architectural contexts, straight lines and sharp edges convey clarity, order, and strength. These features can create environments that feel professional, organized, and efficient. For instance, corporate offices and institutional buildings often utilize straight lines to emphasize functionality and reliability. In these settings, the perception of sharpness or rigidity can be mitigated by the intended purpose of the space, which might prioritize focus and productivity over comfort.

2. Balance with Other Design Elements

The overall emotional impact of a space is often the result of a careful balance between various design elements. While sharp edges might initially suggest a sense of harshness, they can be softened by incorporating other features such as:

Lighting: Warm, natural lighting can soften the appearance of hard lines, making a space feel more welcoming.

Materials: The use of natural materials, such as wood or stone, can counteract the severity of straight lines, adding warmth and texture to the environment. Integrating water features or soft landscaping into the design can also help soften sharper edges and create a more gentle appearance.

Color: Color palettes can significantly alter the perception of a space. Soft, neutral colors can create a calming effect, while vibrant colors might energize the space.

Furniture and Decor: The inclusion of curved furniture and decor elements can provide contrast and balance to spaces dominated by straight lines, introducing a sense of flow and comfort.

3. Personal Preferences and Experiences

Individual preferences and personal experiences also play a critical role in how a space is perceived. What might feel cold and uninviting to one person could feel clean and modern to another. Personal associations and cultural backgrounds can shape our emotional responses to architectural elements.

4. Architectural Intent

The architect’s intent and vision for a space are paramount. Sometimes, a sense of tension or drama is deliberately introduced to evoke specific emotions or thoughts. In these cases, sharp lines and edges can be used to create a sense of awe or emphasize a building’s purpose, such as in museums or art galleries where the architecture itself is part of the artistic narrative.


Understanding the complex interplay of design elements that influence our emotional experience of a space allows architects to create environments that resonate with their intended purpose and audience, offering a nuanced balance between form, function, and human experience. Successful architectural designs balance these elements to create spaces that are both beautiful and efficient. Each form can be used to its advantage, enhancing the overall experience for occupants.

The votes are in, and Architizer is thrilled to unveil the winners of the A+Product Awards! Register for Architizer's A+Product Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

The post Emotional Architecture: How Curves and Lines Influence Human Experience appeared first on Journal.

Head Above the Water: Today’s Blueprints for Building Tomorrow’s Floating Cities

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

With an estimated 2.5 billion people living within 62 miles (100 kilometers) of a coastline, rising sea levels pose a significant risk to human settlements. Traditional land reclamation methods are becoming increasingly unsustainable and environmentally damaging, thus sparking innovative solutions for water-based habitats that are both resilient as well as sustainable. The idea of a floating structure has been carried out as an architectural experiment in many instances. Especially in cities such as Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Seattle, which are in immediate contact with the water, projects such as floating homes, bridges and piers are gradually becoming the norm.

One rather unusual example is the Floating Farm Dairy in Rotterdam by Goldsmith. It is a compact triple-stacked structure housing 40 dairy cows floating in the city harbor of the M4H development zone. The floating farm is an agricultural building based on nautical principles. As a result, its functional organization and use of materials are carefully selected. All heavy structural and technical functions are situated in the submerged part of the building, while the more lightweight components are placed on top. Concrete pontoons house the production of fruits, shielding them from the rain, while translucent polycarbonate is used for the façade.

01_Floating Farm Dairy

02_Floating Farm Dairy

Floating Farm Dairy by Goldsmith, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Reflecting upon the Floating Farm Dairy, the core principle of floating structures is modularity. This design allows for scalability and flexibility, enabling buildings, and potentially, large scale cities to grow organically based on the needs of their inhabitants. In the case of an urban planning strategy, the modules cease to be structural or functional components and are transformed in residential, commercial or in this case industrial proposals. In parallel, by integrating green spaces and urban farms within a city’s functional grid, these new structures provide fresh produce as well as help in regulating temperatures and improving air quality.

Another controversial structure is the Floating House by MOS Architects in Canada. It is part of a master plan of five proposed cabins based on the repetition of a standardized vernacular archetype. Due to the fact that a traditional on-site construction process would have been expensive and quite damaging to the island, the 2,200-square-f00t house was built on a steel pontoon structure near the lake shore. More accurately, it was assembled in a contractor’s shop and eventually towed and anchored to the site, where the final installations were carried out. The exterior cladding comprises of an inventive cedar rainscreen for the walls and roof, providing sufficient air flow within the house.

03_Floating House

Floating house demonstrates that using lightweight, durable, and eco-friendly materials is crucial for building on water. For example, innovations in materials science, such as timber or polycarbonate screens can provide the necessary strength while reducing weight. At the same time, off-site assemblies increase the chances of a more robust as well as zero-carbon construction process.

Finally, the project Floating Islands of Sky by unarchitecte in Chengdu, China, is a pontoon bridge that floats on the surface of the water acting as a crossing between two pieces of land. Numerous challenges such as low-cost construction, a ten-year lifecycle expectancy as well as the varying changes in water level had to be addressed. As a result, steel cables were used to secure the floating bridges to the bottom of the lake, while a series of partially perforated and water-permeable hydrophilic areas were designed in order to deal with the issue of buoyancy. The final design, consisted of seven islands in different sizes, covered in lush vegetation that included spaces for fishing as well as picnic and resting areas. The paths in-between these hexagonal artificial islands are made of planks controlled by air cushions that respond to the changing water levels.

The three projects display various innovative design methods with structural and environmental techniques that prove that floating structures are a very real possibility and not just a vision of a sci-fi future. As climate change accelerates, rising sea levels threaten coastal cities worldwide, putting millions at risk of displacement and thus urging architects to conduct further water-based building experiments. And yet, an ethical point arises, where overbuilding is what is currently causing the myriads of environmental changes happening to our planet, including the gradual flooding of coastal regions. Is it therefore the answer to resort to additional buildings — this time situated on water — in order to respond to this challenge? In other words, humans have already covered the land; wouldn’t then building on water become equally catastrophic for our future?

Contrary to soil and land, the water is much less unforgiving; it requires further study and consideration in terms of structural stability as well as what functions are truly necessary, instead of the ones that are, in fact, merely desired. Water harvesting, food production and energy are also harder to control. Consequently, “floating cities” is an architectural scenario much more sensitive to the world’s ecosystem, which not only responds to the impending crisis of rising waters but could even reverse the damage and impact of our current building philosophy.

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

Featured Image: Floating Farm Dairy by Goldsmith, Rotterdam, Netherlands

The post Head Above the Water: Today’s Blueprints for Building Tomorrow’s Floating Cities appeared first on Journal.

The Tiny Houses of New Jersey: What Architects Can Learn from a Mid-Century Beach Community

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

I was twelve years old the first time I visited Ocean Beach III, a small neighborhood in the shore town of Lavallette, New Jersey. The densely packed one and two-bedroom houses made an immediate impression on me, as did the unpaved sandy roads. Without trees or even structures over one story, there was little shade in this neighborhood, and the streets were flooded with sunlight. This was long before Hurricane Sandy, which encouraged some residents to lift their houses several feet off their foundations, somewhat changing the character of the neighborhood.

It wasn’t often in my suburban childhood that I visited a neighborhood that felt so distinctive. I remember telling my mom and brother that I really liked these “Monopoly houses.” My mom called them “bungalows.” They came in just a few colors: white, gray, sky blue, pale yellow and mint green.

All photos by Pat Finn

I liked these homes on the inside too. My mom’s cousins Jeanne and Kathy had a two bedroom bungalow, and I admired how condensed and efficient everything was. Unlike the larger houses I was familiar with, there was no room to waste space here, no extra closets or a garage to fill with trinkets. There also wasn’t a yard, just a small patio. You could sit here and talk to the next door neighbors on their patio, which was just a few feet away.

My family returned to Jeanne and Kathy’s house a few more times during my childhood, but I didn’t think much about Ocean Beach III until a few years ago when my parents bought their own house here. Their house is not one of the original midcentury homes, however. It is also raised, so it isn’t quite a “Monopoly” house — alas. There are some details, like a sun room and a cupola, that are cool but not quite in keeping with the Edward Scissorhands vibe of the original neighborhood. Still, the home is quite compact by American standards, with one floor and two bedrooms, and like all the other houses in Ocean Beach III, it stands on a tidy 1,500-square-foot (140-square-meter) lot. My parents really only use this house in the summer, but they have made closer friends with their neighbors here than they ever did at their year-round house on the mainland, which sits on a one-acre lot.

Since having children, I have spent more time at my parents’ house and have grown very attached to this beach community. It doesn’t feel quite like any other part of the Jersey shore. Despite the fact that this narrow stretch of the Barnegat peninsula is densely populated, there is no shortage of natural wonder here. My two year old son and I always see swans at the bay in the morning, and a few times we have even glimpsed dolphins in the ocean near the horizon line.

I have often wondered why more neighborhoods in America don’t have this unpretentious, egalitarian feel to them. Am I just picking up on a vacation vibe? Or is there something in the neighborhood’s history that has allowed it to remain an oasis of tiny houses in a state known for McMansions?

The story of Ocean Beach III begins after the end of World War II. As R.C. Staab reported in a 2023 article in New Jersey Monthly, the stretch of land between Point Pleasant and Seaside Heights was undeveloped at this time. Two businessmen, Fred Pearl and Ed Patnaude, had a vision to “turn sparsely developed ocean-view land into communities of vacation homes like the suburban tracts with modest, single-family homes springing up across the country.” The concept was never luxury development, but summer cottages for the working class people who were moving their families out to the suburbs. Home ownership had, at this time, become more accessible than ever before. Fred and Ed were betting on the fact that vacation homes would become more common too. While the duo at first had trouble securing loans for their project, they eventually found an investor in Ed’s brother-in-law.

Staab continues: “To make the economics work, the houses were basic: two bedrooms, a kitchen and living area, a very small bathroom with a shower and toilet, and a porch where a family could sit outside and hear the waves crashing along the beach. They divided up the land into 1,500-square-foot lots of stand-alone homes, side-by-side and back-to-back with enough room for a car (or two) to park and a small patio for barbecuing or taking in the early-morning sun.”

For $2,095, a family could purchase one of these 420-square-foot (40-square-meter) houses on cement slabs. These homes were basic: no heat, no insulation and no air-conditioning. “For showers,” Staab explains, “there was a tin bucket on the roof to collect rainwater that, weather permitting, would be heated by the sun. If a buyer wanted to splurge, a water heater cost $6.”

Fred and Ed’s development expanded quickly. Ocean Beach III was just one of four neighborhoods they created, but it arguably is the most distinctive due to its density. This neighborhood contains almost 1,000 houses in an area about one-third of a square mile. It is perhaps the densest area of single-family homes on the Jersey Shore.

One interesting feature of Ocean Beach III is that a number of homes are on leased land, so while the homeowners own the house they do not own the land. This arrangement keeps the housing prices low, but also allows the landowners to profit because the homeowners need to pay them an annual fee. Apparently, this was a plan of Fred and Ed, and they kept the deeds to a number of the plots. Their descendants still hold them, and thus make money from the development — even today.

The homeowner’s club at Ocean Beach III has made a point of maintaining the small scale of the development. “There are deed restrictions,” explains resident Kevin Iredell. “You can’t go up. You can’t put an addition on. You basically have to leave it the way it is. That keeps that old-school, 1950s kind of Jersey Shore feel.”

John McDonough, one of Fred Pearl’s grandsons, explains it this way: “These are small lots on small streets. [Fred and Ed] didn’t want big houses, tall houses, to create almost a tenement effect, which you have up in the big cities of North Jersey. Most everything is in a checkerboard pattern the way the houses are laid out, so it maximizes the space between each house. You can’t be closer than 10 feet to the rear lot line. You’ve got to be 20 feet minimum away from your neighbor. So there’s always at least 20 feet from all these little houses. You don’t feel like you’re cramped, like someone is right there.”

While many Ocean Beach III residents speak of the neighborhood as a throwback to the 1950s, a “simpler” time, I think of it as futuristic. In the 1950s, as people moved from tenements out to the suburbs, the trend was upsizing. More land, more space, and — for some people — even an extra little cottage out near the shore. This was the American Dream and, from the standpoint of the time, it had nothing to do with simplicity.

Today, however, there is a trend towards downsizing. The tiny house movement has taken off in the US starting in the 2010s as families across the country seek to reduce their energy footprints. While Ocean Beach III was not designed with these concerns in mind, architects can look to this community as a model for future construction. People are happy in Ocean Beach III, the community is walkable, and the population density does not take away from the residents’ ability to appreciate nature. To put it in urban studies terms, the model of detached but closely clustered single family homes on tiny plots might be a way to get the benefits of population density without the drawbacks.

I also think people are happier without attics and garages. There is just less temptation to hold onto junk. Although to be fair, if you look in the crawl spaces of these houses you will always find old surfboards and rusty crab traps.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The post The Tiny Houses of New Jersey: What Architects Can Learn from a Mid-Century Beach Community appeared first on Journal.

Buying on a Promise: The Powerful New Role of Renderings in Real Estate Marketing

Ema is a trained architect, writer and photographer who works as a Junior Architect at REX in NYC. Inspired by her global experiences, she shares captivating insights into the world’s most extraordinary cities and buildings and provides travel tips on her blog, The Travel Album.

Most of us are familiar with pre-ordering books, movies, clothing items and devices — paying in advance to secure one of the newest and most sought-after versions of that item. In the ever-evolving world of real estate, the concept of pre-selling residential units has gained significant traction. Developers often market and sell units based on detailed renderings and visualizations before the building is even constructed. This practice has become a staple in the industry, providing benefits to both developers and early investors. However, it also poses risks and challenges that buyers must consider. This article explores the trend of pre-selling residential units, showcasing select examples that demonstrate the compelling power of renderings and their impact on buyers.

Would you consider purchasing a condo years before it’s built, based solely on attractive renderings and the promise of a great building with no physical structure to inspect? What about the experience of seeing, touching, and even smelling your home before making such a significant purchase? How can you be certain that everything promised will be delivered?


The Concept of Pre-Selling

Pre-selling refers to the practice of selling residential units before the completion of construction. This approach allows developers to secure necessary funding, gauge market interest and mitigate financial risks. Buyers, on the other hand, often benefit from lower pre-construction prices and the opportunity to customize their units. However, purchasing a property based on renderings involves inherent risks, such as potential changes in design, construction delays, and discrepancies between the promised and delivered product.

I’ve seen projects unable to start construction until a certain percentage of units are pre-sold, ensuring significant interest before breaking ground. But I have always wondered, what makes people so drawn to this concept? Typically, buildings in a big pre-sale phase are high-end and brand-new with many perks, great locations and extensive amenities. This makes them attractive, hence the marketing and early sales strategy. Perhaps it’s the notion that you’re making a valuable real estate investment in something exclusive, with the potential risk of it selling out, or becoming more expensive if you wait. The allure of such an incredible building, combined with the fear of missing out, drives people to commit early to secure their place. Financial incentives, such as pre-sale discounts, flexible payment plans and customization options, further entice buyers. A well-established legal and financial framework, including escrow accounts and buyer protections, enhances buyer confidence. These conditions and tactics make pre-construction investments more appealing and convincing.


The Role of Renderings

Renderings are crucial in any architectural project for selling the client on the design. Without the ability to visualize the design, the project is less likely to succeed or sell. In real estate marketing, every interested party is a potential client, making renderings invaluable. They provide potential buyers with a tangible vision of the future property, helping them visualize the finished project and feel more comfortable investing in something yet to be built. High-quality renderings can highlight unique architectural elements, create emotional connections and build buyer confidence. Renderings have the power to evoke strong emotions, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere, sometimes even filled with families to create a sense of togetherness. They can successfully illustrate the potential of the lifestyle you could enjoy if you were to live there. That’s why they are especially crucial in competitive markets, where standing out from other developments is essential.

Advanced technologies, such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), are also being integrated into the marketing strategies, offering immersive experiences that further enhance the appeal of pre-sold units. Showrooms, sales galleries and model units provide a tangible sense of the design, materials, and finishes. Exclusive launch events and private previews generate excitement and urgency, while strong branding and compelling storytelling emphasize the lifestyle, community, and unique selling points of the project.


Highly Successful Pre-Sale Buildings

Several high-profile projects have successfully used renderings to pre-sell units, demonstrating the power of visualizations in real estate marketing. I would like to explore three notable examples:

1. 520 Fifth Avenue by Kohn Peterson Fox (KPF), New York City, New York

520 Fifth Avenue Amenities Renderings (Credit: Binyan Studios)

520 Fifth Avenue by Kohn Peterson Fox (KPF), New York City, New York| Amenities Renderings by Binyan Studios

520 Fifth Avenue stands out as one of the most remarkable success stories in pre-sales, having sold over 50% of its units just three months after launch. It is on pace to become the fastest-selling condominium of 2024. This kind of traffic and interest is something that hasn’t been seen since before the pandemic, and likely can be attributed to its prime location just north of Bryant Park and its impressive 1,000-foot height that will make it the tallest residential building on Fifth Avenue.

Slated for completion in 2026, the architectural design showcased through stunning visualizations, offers a contemporary twist on Beaux-Arts style. The sales team at 520 Fifth Avenue notes that buyers are acting with urgency and are keen to purchase full floor plans. They believe that this demand is driven by a shortage of quality inventory, combined with the project’s appealing pricing, prime location and exceptional construction quality. The limited availability of high-quality options on the market has spurred interest, positioning this development as a highly attractive investment well before its completion.

2. 50 West 66th Street by Snøhetta, New York City, New York

Renderings of 50 West 66th Street, Credit: Recent Spaces Renderings of 50 West 66th Street, Credit: Recent Spaces

Renderings of 50 West 66th Street, Credit: Recent Spaces

50 West 66th Street by Snøhetta, New York City, New York | Renderings by Recent Spaces

Also over 50% sold, the pre-sales success of 50 West 66th Street can be attributed to its status as the tallest building on the Upper West Side, reaching 775 feet, and its prime location near Central Park and Lincoln Center. Designed by Snøhetta, this 70-story skyscraper offers residences with breathtaking views of the Manhattan skyline, Central Park, and the Hudson River. In fact, this building represents Snøhetta’s first residential project in the United States, lending it distinctive architectural significance given the firm’s renowned reputation.

The building’s two residence collections—The House, with pre-war elegance, and The Tower, with modern glass-walled designs—cater to different tastes. The limited availability of new construction in the Upper West Side area, combined with the project’s architectural significance and prime location, has driven strong demand. Buyers have been eager to secure a home in this landmark building, ensuring a high quality of living in one of Manhattan’s most desirable neighborhoods. The renderings of this property excel at showcasing not only the building itself but also the surrounding views and cityscape, giving you a vivid sense of what living there would be like.

3. The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Miami, Florida

The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Credit: The Boundary

The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Credit: The Boundary

The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Credit: The Boundary

The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Credit: The Boundary

The Perigon Miami Beach by OMA, Miami, Florida | Renderings by The Boundary 

With construction well underway and scheduled for completion in 2026, The Perigon Miami Beach has stood out in the pre-sales phase due to its prime location that offers unparalleled views of the Atlantic Ocean, Biscayne Bay and Miami’s skyline. Designed by architects OMA, its position and location has fulfilled the need for a new tower in mid-beach. There has been overwhelming interest, with 70% of domestic buyers affirming the strength and quality of the design and the appeal of the larger residences. Additionally, there has been significant interest from foreign buyers, including those from Canada.

The strategic mid-beach location, combined with the building’s offerings and meticulous design, makes The Perigon a highly sought-after property. Buyers are motivated to pre-purchase units to secure a prestigious address in one of Miami’s most luxurious developments, anticipating both lifestyle benefits and potential value appreciation. The building’s renderings not only effectively sell the property and its units but, in my opinion, also successfully promote the city and what it has to offer. They showcase warm, inviting tones, expansive water views, brightly lit and welcoming spaces, and a seamless blend of indoor and outdoor living, all of which are highly appealing.


Images as a Powerful Tool

Several key factors contribute to buyers’ confidence in investing in properties still under construction. Some of these include the developer’s reputation, the property’s location, and the development’s position within a rapidly growing area. Additionally, setting the right price for a building or unit requires comprehensive market analysis, cost evaluation, and a clear understanding of the project’s value proposition.

But above all else, in my opinion, the most impactful factor is the quality of the renderings created and the story behind the way they are being presented. Images have a powerful way of grabbing attention. People naturally gravitate toward the most visually appealing object or image in a room. Crafting an effective rendering goes beyond the skill of the visual artist; it involves a nuanced blend of trust, strategic marketing, understanding diverse audiences, delivering on promises and addressing what people truly want. Understanding the factors that drive buyer confidence and employing effective strategies can lead to successful pre-sales, while developers must manage expectations and ensure the final product meets or exceeds initial promises to maintain credibility and achieve long-term success.


Future Trends in Pre-Selling and Real Estate Marketing

The future of pre-selling in real estate looks promising, with emerging technologies poised to revolutionize the process. VR and AR are becoming more prevalent, allowing buyers to explore properties in an immersive environment before they are built. These technologies can provide a more accurate representation of the final product, reducing the gap between expectations and reality. Developers and architects who leverage these innovations can enhance their marketing strategies and improve buyer satisfaction. While the decision remains significant and demands careful consideration and thorough research for a successful investment, it’s expected that as technology advances and marketing strategies evolve, pre-selling practices will become increasingly common and sophisticated.

Architects: Want to have your project featured? Showcase your work through Architizer and sign up for our inspirational newsletters.

The post Buying on a Promise: The Powerful New Role of Renderings in Real Estate Marketing appeared first on Journal.

Building on the Edge: Can Antarctic Architecture Guide Global Sustainable Design?

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

Recent temperatures at Cape Shirreff have rested at around 14 Fahrenheit (-10 Celcius). But once 55 miles per hour (89 kilometers) wind gusts are taken into account, it’s felt more like -16.6 Fahrenheit (-27 Celcius). Extreme cold by anyone’s standards, this couldn’t sound further removed from the hottest ever day recorded on Earth — Monday July 25th — when global thermostats averaged 16.3 Fahrenheit (17.15 Celcius). This beat the previous record, which had been set just 24 hours earlier. 

Yet sub-zero climates are where global heating is the strongest. Speaking with British polar explorer Felicity Aston MBE earlier this year about her all-female, four-year expedition to the Arctic, B.I.G. (Before It’s Gone), she painted a bleak picture. The project, which initially aimed to measure microplastics in sea ice, had to be completely reimagined because it’s becoming impossible to reach the North Pole on skis as once-frozen oceans become increasingly unstable and defrosted. 

Antarctica is experiencing similar phenomena on the other side of our planet. Since 1950, this snowbound continent has seen average annual temperatures rise by 37.4 Fahrenheit (3 Celcius), more than anywhere else in the Southern Hemisphere, triggering a collapse of ice shelves that is gathering pace. This is the frontline of a climate crisis unfolding in real-time, and we need scientists here to fully understand what’s happening and what that might mean for the rest of us. Suffice to say, though, building in this remote environment is tough, let alone constructing something that can endure brutal elements over long periods of time.

Holt Watters Field Camp by Colorado Building Workshop at the University of Colorado, Denver and Bespoke Project Solutions, Antarctica

Holt Watters Field Camp, at Cape Shirreff, is an essential base for scientific study in the region. Here, the Antarctic Ecosystems Research Division of NOAA Fisheries has been studying the dynamics, behavior, diet and overall health of native seabirds and pinnipeds. But after 20 years, the facilities were deteriorating and in desperate need of an upgrade. Enter the Colorado Building Workshop at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Bespoke Project Solutions, who worked together to deliver a solution. 

The designs are defined by resilience and functionalism. Spanning 2,000 square feet (185 square meters), the main campus comprises three prefabricated buildings with no component larger than 1 by 4 by 16 feet. This meant they could be transported into place on zodiac dinghies, and no more than four people were needed to lift any single part. Thanks to these lightweight properties, the entire facility was assembled during a single austral summer —the two month period that is the only time of year when such work would be possible. The pre-fabrication strategies also sought to virtually eliminate all construction waste.

Holt Watters Field Camp by Colorado Building Workshop at the University of Colorado, Denver and Bespoke Project Solutions, Antarctica

Sections of the new Holt Watters Field Camp arrive by zodiac dinghy by Colorado Building Workshop at the University of Colorado, Denver and Bespoke Project Solutions, Antarctica

Completed early-2024, Holt Watters Field Camp now comprises two buildings standing side-by-side, their offset gable roofs collecting vital rainwater — the only fresh water source available for the scientists. A third structure runs behind that pair, acting as a wind fence to stop snow building up in the courtyard, while the roof is topped with a P.V. array, providing clean solar energy to power operations.

The complex is not only self-sufficient in terms of resources, it has also been created with minimal maintenance as a priority thanks to light-interfering color stainless steel cladding covering the roof and walls — 75% of this material is recycled content. Meanwhile, the interior uses water-resistant Meranti plywood, hiding thick insulation that provides a comfortable working environment. 

The blueprint succeeds because of its simplicity. Antarctica is an unforgiving place that doesn’t suffer fools gladly, nor overly complex designs. Anything being erected here needs to be finished efficiently, meaning without superlatives, with every aspect and element serving a tangible purpose that contributes to a greater mission.

The main campus at Holt Watters Field Camp takes form by Colorado Building Workshop at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Bespoke Project Solutions

This simplicity is born out of necessity, of course, but ironically it’s also an approach that could, should, and is increasingly informing the most sustainable architecture across the globe. Use only what you need is a long-forgotten mantra humans would do well to reintroduce into common parlance. 

A few degrees further south, and the British Antarctic Survey has also received significant investment in the past 12 months through the Antarctic Infrastructure Modernisation Programme. The UK’s Rothera Research Station is in the process of an extensive upgrade, with a milestone reached just last month as a 32-year-old airstrip was fully resurfaced and brought back online.

The new Discovery Building at Rothera Research Station by Hugh Broughton Architects and British Antarctic Survey, Antarctica 

Rock from a previous project on the same peninsula was used for as much of the work as possible, significantly cutting overall impact by reducing the amount of virgin materials involved and transportation footprints. Draining has been improved around the base to boost resilience, and again solar technology is utilized to provide clean, self-sufficient power. A new Discovery Building, dedicated to science, benefits from high levels of internal insulation, offering a protected, warm workspace for teams.

This project is made even more remarkable due to the fact joiners, electricians and other tradespeople drafted for the improvements have ‘wintered’ with the on-site team, working on internal aspects during months when the skies never get light, and the weather is beyond challenging. It’s a huge order to ask of anyone, but the importance of these efforts cannot be understated.

Just as Aston discovered through the aptly-titled B.I.G. expedition, the extremities of our planet are bearing the brunt of human-driven climate change, and thanks to their deceptively vulnerable nature, will be the first places on the planet to change irrevocably because of our behavior. With this in mind, ensuring the uninterrupted, continued study of these regions, while they still exist as we currently know them, must be a scientific imperative. The architects throwing their weight behind such initiatives are also pioneering more sustainable design approaches that architects worldwide would benefit from heeding.

The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

The post Building on the Edge: Can Antarctic Architecture Guide Global Sustainable Design? appeared first on Journal.

The Future of Architecture: Changing How Housing Is Built in the World’s Most Disaster-Prone Countries

This interview was conducted by Lisa Richmond. Architecture 2030’s mission is to rapidly transform the built environment from a major emitter of greenhouse gases to a central source of solutions to the climate crisis. For 20 years, the nonprofit has provided leadership and designed actions toward this shift and a healthy future for all.

Build Change is a global leader in systems change for resilient housing. The public benefit corporation coordinates engineers, builders, coders, policy advocates and lending partners to provide urgently needed housing solutions in the world’s most disaster-prone countries. Shifting power to families since 2004, Build Change has safeguarded over $4.7 billion in housing infrastructure assets across Latin America, the Caribbean and Asia-Pacific, improving the lives of over 1.17 million people by building new or retrofitting more than 230,000 buildings at the cost of $58 per safer person.

Architecture 2030’s Lisa Richmond caught up with Ariana Karamallis, Build Change’s Global Advocacy and Development Associate, to talk about what they do and what’s ahead in the work towards community resilience in the context of climate change.

Photo of a home being retrofitted courtesy of Build Change

Lisa Richmond: Build Change designs disaster-resilient housing and schools in developing nations and changes construction practices and regulations to promote safer buildings. When and why did you add climate change and decarbonization as topline considerations in your work?

Ariana Karamallis: At our core, Build Change is about shifting power to those most affected by natural disasters. Beyond designing housing and schools, we transform systems for regulating, financing, building and improving informal housing across the Global South. Retrofitting existing housing has been a core piece of our work since the 2010 Haiti earthquake, when we saw the opportunity to retrofit damaged buildings to produce safe, permanent housing more quickly. Since then, buildings in Nepal, the Philippines, Colombia and beyond have been strengthened at a fraction of the cost of building new.

Retrofitting is not just an investment in a building but in a community and the people that live there. By retrofitting somebody’s existing house, they get to retain a meaningful asset. Most of our retrofitting work includes habitability improvements – ventilation, improved lighting, improved water and sanitation. Sometimes it includes the addition of a second story, adding space and income generating opportunities through rental units or home based businesses. We have emotional connections to our homes as well. In cases where the alternative may be relocating, there are a lot of social and economic benefits to people getting to stay where they live.

Decarbonization entered the picture for us a bit more recently. Over the last few years we began to ask ourselves if we could quantify the environmental benefits of retrofitting. Our research applied established methods for calculating emissions associated with building materials and construction to our housing improvement programs. This work culminated last year with the publication of Saving Embodied Carbon through Strengthening Existing Housing, providing compelling evidence that improving existing housing significantly avoids carbon emissions. We estimate there’s an opportunity to save 4.8 gigatons of CO2 emissions globally while addressing the more than 268 million inadequate houses.

Photo of a Colombia site visit courtesy of Build Change

LR: Most of the growth in global floor area over the next few decades will occur in the rapidly developing regions where Build Change works, places where growth is necessary to meet the basic needs of growing populations. Your work is trying to meet basic needs while staying within our planetary boundaries. How does Build Change think about balancing these two imperatives?

AK: We have to view this through a justice lens. Globally, those who contributed the least to the climate crisis are those most vulnerable to its impacts. We cannot compromise on delivering resilient housing, clean water, safe sanitation services and access to safe schools and hospitals. Nor should these communities pay the price of living, working or learning in buildings that are less resilient.

Luckily, retrofitting offers a practical solution. Millions of people worldwide do not need a new home, they need a disaster-resilient home. By improving existing unsafe housing, we can build less while addressing the needs of those lacking these basics.

Of course, there are some people for whom retrofitting is not an option. For the millions living in homes too informal to retrofit, new homes will have to be built, most likely incrementally by the residents themselves. In these cases, we must ensure that all those in the housing value chain are equipped to build resilient homes, ensuring durable buildings that reduce waste.

Photo of a retrofitted home courtesy of Build Change

LR: Your research reports emphasize the lack of hard data around embodied carbon, particularly in the Global South. Why is that data important, and what are some strategies to make it more standardized and readily available?

AK: Lack of hard data around embodied carbon in existing, informally built housing is one of the major challenges in undertaking housing improvement projects or retrofits, especially in the Global South. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) in these settings should be standardized and publicly reported to assess the relative benefits of different housing programs, for both post-disaster and preventative strengthening. Good data can serve as a useful resource for publicly funded projects to demonstrate the environmental impacts. This can also make it easier for investors into privately owned housing to demonstrate the overall positive impact of the investment.

Photo of a brick maker in Indonesia courtesy of Build Change

LR: You work extensively in the informal economy, where much of the housing is self-built. Does vernacular architecture model useful technology to accelerate climate action?

AK: In many contexts, informal, self-built housing has already been adapted for local culture and climate, using building materials that are locally available. This generally reduces costs and takes into consideration historic climate conditions such as heat.

However, with rising rates of urbanization, some of these methods have been lost, while others require structural reinforcements to provide added safety. We can invest a small amount of embodied carbon in strengthening and improving these homes, to prevent a complete loss of embodied carbon should that home be reduced to a pile of rubble during an earthquake, blown away in a windstorm, or converted to greenhouse gasses during a fire.

Build Change advocates for small changes to existing ways of building using locally available materials and commonly preferred architecture. One example is Nepal. They’ve been able to use quite a bit of the traditional masonry techniques and technology and reinforce that to make the homes disaster resilient.

Photo of a home courtesy of Build Change

LR: Architecture 2030 has seen you in action at the UN Climate Summits (COPs), advocating for changes to the way we build. How is the COP process a lever for policy change?

AK: The next decade will be critical in addressing gaps in climate commitments. With the next round of updates to Paris Agreement Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) due in 2025, the moment is ripe for integrating ambitious goals into climate planning. Governments should include housing upgrades within their national climate plans, as well as provisions for building code upgrades. 

Retrofitting existing housing is an adaptation strategy as the impacts of climate change become more frequent and acute.  From the mitigation side, strengthening existing housing saves embodied carbon.  If you look at Africa as one example, there are millions of needed homes that either don’t yet exist or are inadequate. If we can retrofit some of those rather than build new, the embodied carbon savings will be immense. 

Photo of construction work in Haiti courtesy of Design Build


Lisa Richmond, Hon. AIA, is a Senior Fellow with Architecture 2030 and a thought leader on climate and the built environment. Through Climate Strategy Works, Lisa supports clients in strategic planning, concept development, strategic communication and brand positioning within the UNFCCC global climate dialogues. She was a delegate and speaker at three recent UN climate summits: COP26 in Glasgow, COP27 in Sharm-el-Sheikh and COP28 in Dubai.


The jury and the public have had their say — feast your eyes on the winners of Architizer's 12th Annual A+Awards. Subscribe to our Awards Newsletter to receive future program updates.

The post The Future of Architecture: Changing How Housing Is Built in the World’s Most Disaster-Prone Countries appeared first on Journal.

The New Canon: 5 Standout Techniques that Dominate Contemporary Architectural Photography

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

Once a niche field, architectural photography is now a crucial part of the design world. Today, it plays a key role in shaping global understandings of architecture and transforming how we perceive and engage with buildings.

That being said, in this day and age, architectural photography encompasses way more than simply capturing the physical structure of buildings. It has also become an essential tool for telling the story of a building, illustrating its design narrative and showcasing its unique qualities. In a sea of digital images, the job of today’s architectural photographer is also distinct from those of the film generation, who were producing work for print journals and books, as opposed to press releases and algorithms. Moreover, high-quality architectural photography is now a decisive component for winning architecture awards, gaining recognition and successfully promoting architectural projects.

As architectural tendencies have shifted towards more complex, dynamic and human-centered designs, the techniques and approaches in architectural photography have evolved to match. Photographers are pushing the boundaries of traditional techniques, embracing new technologies and creative approaches to capture the essence of these innovative designs. Looking at the highlights of this season’s A+Awards Winners, these tendencies are reflected in the works of architectural photographers who shot winning projects.


1. Populated Places: Animating Architecture

One of the most significant shifts in photography lately has been the embrace of candid, real-life shots. Consider the average Instagram feed — there are probably a lot fewer over-planned, over-edited photos and instead, more and more photos that seem like they’ve effortlessly captured a moment.

This tendency translates into professional photography as well (architectural photography included). Instead of photographing empty buildings devoid of life, more architectural photographers choose to capture their subjects in use, with people interacting within and around them.

Iwan Baan is renowned for bringing this more documentary-like approach into the architectural mainstream beginning with his pioneering collaboration with Rem Koolhaas. The Dutch photographer’s most recent work for A+winning projects definitely upholds the high standards he has set. Baan is known for challenging the long-standing tradition of capturing buildings as isolated and static. Instead, he aims to showcase the activities taking place within and around the structures he shoots, portraying them in use.

Casa Lohr by Veinte Diezz Arquitectos, Mérida, Mexico | Photo by Manolo R. Solis.

Many photographers take this approach further by shooting in motion, resulting in images with blurry figures. This technique can make the architecture feel more three-dimensional and dynamic, adding a sense of depth and realism. While this style might not appeal to everyone, it offers a fresh perspective by emphasizing the lived experience within architectural spaces.


2. Cinematic Photography: Embracing Distinct Moods

When browsing through Architizer’s A+Awards Winners Gallery, another pattern stands out: an increasing number of photos are embracing cinematic techniques. Cinematic photography aims to evoke emotional and sensory experiences, creating a specific atmosphere through lighting, color and composition. When the subject is architecture, it does much the same — capturing the mood and ambiance of a space.

The Hat House by Tina Bergman Architects, Sweden | Photo by Jim Stephenson Architectural Photography + Films

The Hat House by Tina Bergman Architects, Sweden | Photo by Jim Stephenson Architectural Photography + Films

A great example is The Hat House by Tina Bergman Architects, located in the calm forests of Sweden, captured by Jim Stephenson. He uses warm lighting and natural colors to evoke a sense of comfort and connection with nature. The photos capture the cozy and welcoming environment of the house, doing a great job of portraying what it would feel like to be there.

YOFC Headquarters by Gensler, Wuhan, China | Photo by RAWVISION Studio

Similarly, Gensler’s YOFC Headquarters shot by RAWVISION Studio uses warm, golden illumination against the cool tones of the evening cityscape, highlighting the building amidst a quiet urban setting.

This tendency enriches our appreciation of architectural spaces, making them more relatable and memorable by telling the story of a building through its mood and atmosphere. Just by looking at a photo, you can practically feel what it’s like to be in a particular space or building.


3. Organized Maximalism: Layered Compositions Over Minimalistic Details

You might have noticed the subtle (or on second thought, maybe not so subtle) resurgence of maximalism in design.

While minimalism definitely had its moment, it’s safe to say that ornament is no longer a crime (and hopefully awful puns aren’t either). As architects and designers welcome back color, texture and complexity, architectural photographers are embracing more complex, layered compositions as opposed to detail-focused shots.

The Abrahamic Family House by Adjaye Associates, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates | Photo by Deed Studio-UAE.

In the past, we often saw close-up images highlighting simplicity and clean lines. These shots focused on a few select elements, isolating them to emphasize architectural purity and design precision. Nowadays, the so-called “organized maximalism” has reached architectural photography as well.

Instead of isolating details, photographers are capturing richer, more textured views by incorporating multiple layers and elements into the frame. This approach showcases the interplay between materials, forms, light and shadow, creating a dynamic and engaging visual narrative.

By including a variety of elements—like people, furnishings and natural features—these photos convey a sense of depth and complexity. It’s about showing how different parts of a building relate to each other and their surroundings, offering a more holistic view of the architecture.

The House of Courtyards by VDGA Studio, Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Photo by Ema Peter Photography.

Ema Peter captures this incredibly well in her winning shot for the cover of Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture this year. In the image, she balances architectural elements with natural features and human presence. The photo showcases the warm texture of the building materials, the play of light and shadow and the calming presence of water reflecting the surroundings. The inclusion of a person adds scale and a sense of life, while the carefully framed layers guide the viewer’s eye through the space, emphasizing the depth and richness of the design. This not only brings out the beauty of the architecture but also tells a story about how the space is used and experienced.

Order Book Now


4. Retro Revival: Embracing Vintage Aesthetics

Tower 15 by OODA Architecture, Leça da Palmeira, Portugal | Photo by Fernando Guerra.

Tower 15 by OODA Architecture, Leça da Palmeira, Portugal | Photo by Fernando Guerra.

One of the most memorable photos from this year’s A+Winners is Fernando Guerra’s shots for OODA’s Torre 15&1. Guerra uses high contrast to bring out the building’s repetitive patterns and clean lines. The deep shadows cast by the balconies create a sense of depth and rhythm, making the structure stand out dramatically.

There’s something distinctly retro about this approach. Perhaps it’s the way these photos evoke the graphic quality of classic poster art, where bold lines and stark contrasts were used to make powerful visual statements. Guerra’s style often leverages this high-contrast approach to make architectural forms pop, giving even the most rigid structures a sense of fluidity and dynamism. His work consistently showcases how light can transform buildings, making the mundane appear extraordinary.

MAISON BRUMMELL MAJORELLE by Studio Bergendy Cooke, Marrakesh, Morocco | Photo by Emily Andrews

This retro aesthetic in architectural photography taps into a sense of nostalgia, bringing a vintage feel to modern structures. By using techniques similar to classic film photography and poster art, photographers can evoke a timeless quality in their images. This style highlights the elegance and enduring appeal of architectural designs, making them feel both historic and contemporary. The vintage look adds visual interest and connects viewers to the past, creating a stronger emotional connection with the architecture.


5. Contrast, Depth and Drama

In a market saturated with images, high-contrast photography is quickly gaining traction as a way to stand out.

In architectural photography, this translates to highlighting specific elements and structural details, creating striking silhouettes and a dynamic interplay of light and shadow. High-contrast photography brings the structural details and materials of buildings to life. Shadows carve out the textures and light defines the forms, adding a compelling visual narrative to the spaces. This approach works particularly well with monochromatic structures, where the absence of color makes the contrast even more pronounced.

Red Box by Mix Architecture, Nanjing, China | Photo by Arch-Exist Photography

Red Box by Mix Architecture, Nanjing, China | Photo by Arch-Exist Photography

Beautifully captured by on of China’s leading architectural photography firms, Arch-Exist, Mix Architecture’s A+Award-winning project is a great example of how contrast can do wonders for monochromatic spaces. The use of high contrast in these interior shots accentuates the rich textures and sharp lines of the red concrete, transforming the space into a scene with a cinematic quality. The shadows and light filtering through the perforations in the walls add depth and a touch of mystery, making the architecture feel alive, dynamic and far from two-dimensional.


Framing the Future

The recent shifts in architectural photography bring a refreshing evolution, allowing photographers to portray buildings in more authentic and engaging ways. From capturing candid interactions to evoking the mood and atmosphere of a space, these new tendencies add depth and richness to architectural imagery. And as they continue to develop, we can’t help but feel excited about what the future holds for architectural photography.

The latest edition of “Architizer: The World’s Best Architecture” — a stunning, hardbound book celebrating the most inspiring contemporary architecture from around the globe — is now available. Order your copy today.  

The post The New Canon: 5 Standout Techniques that Dominate Contemporary Architectural Photography appeared first on Journal.